Received: (qmail 23088 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2011 15:33:36 -0500 Received: from freelists-180.iquest.net (HELO turing.freelists.org) (206.53.239.180) by static-ip-85-25-126-90.inaddr.ip-pool.com with SMTP; 29 Aug 2011 15:32:41 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 1F219E3C3B1; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:32:12 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=freelists.org; s=turing; t=1314649932; bh=QgX8rs2QifOMOn2vax65F3KLGYqlzBpdMGzbIxhF Fnw=; h=References:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:List-help: List-unsubscribe:List-Id:List-subscribe:List-owner:List-post: List-archive; b=mYssj6BBwbhfl+nN66rbsv4glXHWVUN11HlhPJaT2bl3l/SCjQ zrODzTgeV41ON94teDpqmJukKvOccDibVsvGQfqGIW6NZuS5UyGss+kkQQSEwBggfEn 9xfm2oY8IrJzze8MZcaMNxOHBqDT4gue1aXmFls/C9MHZGLu0IXB30= X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at localhost.localdomain Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k+K84MzKVq5Q; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:32:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from turing.freelists.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id D3FFBE3C1F6; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:31:27 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=freelists.org; s=turing; t=1314649929; bh=QgX8rs2QifOMOn2vax65F3KLGYqlzBpdMGzbIxhF Fnw=; h=References:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:List-help: List-unsubscribe:List-Id:List-subscribe:List-owner:List-post: List-archive; b=fYuZ8LPBNcbaKfD70WkA2UQa9x2PfsbeS1b+8P2WCs3d5KpUr1 XEHo2BuY26/mFMsZlLZGgjLA2zgOydIaNRXuAnvp18COaObwnIGFWDRRyEsgknKIoIm GdXrdA27VkcurAKmCSOF6BIq8io7qFBp29ah9FHHhGAPpID/3xxbzA= Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:30:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 671C8E3C216 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:30:45 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: turing.freelists.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i=@yahoo.com Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mmb2VF2spl6B for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:30:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nm24.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (nm24.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [98.139.52.221]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with SMTP id 221BCE3C205 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:30:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [98.139.52.192] by nm24.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 29 Aug 2011 20:30:43 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.183] by tm5.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 29 Aug 2011 20:30:43 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1066.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 29 Aug 2011 20:30:43 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 110909.42132.bm@omp1066.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 18689 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Aug 2011 20:30:43 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1314649842; bh=m6UoklQGJ+Z/4fUEPe0s+RAmses9UCzHbjIvQMrRttE=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=lext/XbcFvIe2pC6RknFUhPl10C9CxGnfA+x0Lu+wwU4bXDcfCATgROknqQ+wGxhwLL1Ur3iEaaafTgrBYxOsSVXREzLyfQDnqYkgxEzOlGzoU7cULxyw5AvLYHil+mngOxBKE3yPKd80IJsiNWulI88os6AN+psDi6hugmwXmM= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=4YtIPEpmCfzJLtoSzyd7I9GRion7kOEd+mUhoHKuo1TD3fnSbyia4A7DdRxAWxhsCJJ9zyrLc/aApb1euoaVoWgqf+WfpAflYe38gg+R2Ray0OZ46eYDyq0G2m88SKB0boH6SRdcBIIbtmb7xC6jdGErpuzeCSjjv3AZ2DiimAA=; X-YMail-OSG: wQ.ElfgVM1kwefIz5MGaDQHChtjBRA3a5znr74MMVao9uLj i1t_a7NK2MzwzfmaGmv.RZXaZjmr.VIEgeBUNdoGBa31Gqeg9KFFTGvK_pYC 66hbDLWd9NPT.NbF13be.bedrwej2r_qTDyqV9827x0l0Nx9RpVHWHZltRUa yVTvVl_MduLmTNoVqTrywLJeOvcDHnEZnkovC9BgBumLeD3OhkgyNHFvxjsD 01zFtpW8kj2Es9eF6BHh0gnGFCKSZt21lGdClVolWRzdjDw.GOO94nU3Azn3 fycuvDsBzrA48XUK1Qb6M0jyjO.xeJE_rAugWUrlTIbM47Ik2hVzd81KsTdp xUAU1gEj8ZxvuuCR3.LJC_cSega5YgTdDOIa2qHCEgxr5yHucUZjfTAjO1T9 7F6leGD6eJhLmDhriJF1SdMgb2TCLN5pbCcd0RKuDMntwpKTfApXjTG777D2 .5LL9n19sNDCNBpkHQ_rZw193vGpeF6UWPCnh5KOyBodoVyxKdWmI0WDja.Q 17T4KWS0E5INc8awqZbjVEAZeAQfFGIMHxgLibGi7lOGCLg-- Received: from [208.240.243.170] by web65402.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:30:42 PDT References: <8702332A6FE19B4FB526047905C1A1EEA914C4C380@DC2EXCVS01.ES.AD.ADP.COM> <30F0E1CB5AC745DA95E2E7DA0E0F719B@Primary> <8702332A6FE19B4FB526047905C1A1EEA914CE79B2@DC2EXCVS01.ES.AD.ADP.COM> <8702332A6FE19B4FB526047905C1A1EEA914CE7A5F@DC2EXCVS01.ES.AD.ADP.COM> Message-ID: <1314649842.15352.YahooMailNeo@web65402.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:30:42 -0700 (PDT) From: David Fitzjarrell Subject: Re: ORA-01450: maximum key length (3215) exceeded -- Can't create index online with an nvarchar2 column To: "Mark_Kudryk@ADP.com" , "oracle-l@freelists.org" In-Reply-To: <8702332A6FE19B4FB526047905C1A1EEA914CE7A5F@DC2EXCVS01.ES.AD.ADP.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1770168762-1314649842=:15352" X-archive-position: 38421 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-to: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: oratune@yahoo.com Precedence: normal Reply-To: oratune@yahoo.com List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: oracle-l X-List-ID: oracle-l List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: oracle-l --0-1770168762-1314649842=:15352 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Before you do check how NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS is set; it may be set for CHAR= rather than BYTE.=A0 If it's set correctly (BYTE) and this still occurs su= bmit an SR.=0A=0A=0ADavid Fitzjarrell=0A=0A=0AFrom: "Kudryk, Mark" =0ATo: "oracle-l@freelists.org" =0ASen= t: Monday, August 29, 2011 1:08 PM=0ASubject: RE: ORA-01450: maximum key le= ngth (3215) exceeded -- Can't create index online with an nvarchar2 column= =0A=0AI've looked at the trace.=A0 Here's the portion where the index is be= ing created...=0A=0A*******************************************************= *************************=0A=0Acreate index MK_INDEX_NVARCHAR_N351 ON mk_te= st_length_n351 (data_field_id, =0A=A0 UPPER(additional_data_n351), invoice_= id) tablespace indx online=0A=0A=0Acall=A0 =A0 count=A0 =A0 =A0 cpu=A0 =A0 = elapsed=A0 =A0 =A0 disk=A0 =A0 =A0 query=A0 =A0 current=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 rows= =0A------- ------=A0 -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------= =A0 ----------=0AParse=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 1=A0 =A0 =A0 0.01=A0 =A0 =A0 0.02=A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 1=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 0=0AExecute=A0 =A0 =A0 1=A0 =A0 =A0 0.02=A0 =A0 =A0 0.01=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0= =A0 0=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 1=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 27=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0=0AFetch= =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0=A0 =A0 =A0 0.00=A0 =A0 =A0 0.00=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0=A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0=0A------- -----= -=A0 -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------=A0 ----------=0At= otal=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 2=A0 =A0 =A0 0.03=A0 =A0 =A0 0.03=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0= =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 2=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 27=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0=0A=0AMisses in= library cache during parse: 1=0AOptimizer mode: FIRST_ROWS=0AParsing user = id: 121=A0 =0A*************************************************************= *******************=0A=0AAnd here is the portion where the IOT is being cre= ated.=0A=0A****************************************************************= ****************=0A=0Acreate table "DOCPADMIN"."SYS_JOURNAL_425558" (C0 NUM= BER, C1 NVARCHAR2(1053), =0A=A0 C2 NUMBER,=A0 opcode char(1), partno number= ,=A0 rid rowid, primary key( C0, C1, =0A=A0 C2 , rid )) organization index = TABLESPACE "INDX"=0A=0A=0Acall=A0 =A0 count=A0 =A0 =A0 cpu=A0 =A0 elapsed= =A0 =A0 =A0 disk=A0 =A0 =A0 query=A0 =A0 current=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 rows=0A----= --- ------=A0 -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------=A0 -----= -----=0AParse=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 1=A0 =A0 =A0 0.02=A0 =A0 =A0 0.00=A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 0=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0=0A= Execute=A0 =A0 =A0 1=A0 =A0 =A0 0.01=A0 =A0 =A0 0.01=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0= =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 3=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0=0AFetch=A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 0=A0 =A0 =A0 0.00=A0 =A0 =A0 0.00=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0=A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 0=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0=0A------- ------=A0= -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------=A0 ----------=0Atotal= =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 2=A0 =A0 =A0 0.03=A0 =A0 =A0 0.01=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0=A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 3=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0=0A=0AMisses in = library cache during parse: 1=0AOptimizer mode: FIRST_ROWS=0AParsing user i= d: 121=A0 =A0 (recursive depth: 1)=0A**************************************= ******************************************=0A=0AInitially when I read this,= I assumed the NVARCHAR2(1053) was defined in bytes (351 * 3).=A0 But it's = not... it's in characters, the data length of this field in the IOT will ac= tually be 3159.=A0 Plugging this value into the formula, I get an overall l= ength of 3217, which exceeds the limit.=0A=0AI'll raise an SR.=0A=0AMark=0A= =0A-----Original Message-----=0AFrom: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org [mailto= :oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Kudryk, Mark (ES)=0ASent: Mond= ay, August 29, 2011 1:54 PM=0ATo: oracle-l@freelists.org=0ASubject: RE: ORA= -01450: maximum key length (3215) exceeded -- Can't create index online wit= h an nvarchar2 column=0A=0AThanks. Mea Culpa on the length.=0A=0A-----Origi= nal Message-----=0AFrom: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bou= nce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Lewis=0ASent: Monday, August 29, 2= 011 12:28 PM=0ATo: oracle-l@freelists.org=0ASubject: Re: ORA-01450: maximum= key length (3215) exceeded -- Can't create index online with an nvarchar2 = column=0A=0A=0AI would enable sql_trace and look at the create statement pr= oduced for the =0Ajournalling IOT.=0AYour 2011 is wrong, it should be 1,111= ; if (for no good reason) you multiply the =0Acolumn length by 3 (again), t= he answer comes to 3217.=0A=0ASo, taking a guess, Oracle has taken the data= length as 3 x char_length, and =0Athen the journal code has defined it's c= har_length as the result - which has =0Ataken ITS data_length to 9 times th= e original char_length.=0A=0ARaise an SR if I'm right.=0A=0ARegards=0A=0AJo= nathan Lewis=0Ahttp://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com=0A=0A=0A----- Original Me= ssage ----- =0AFrom: "Kudryk, Mark" =0ATo: =0ASent: Monday, August 29, 2011 5:05 PM=0ASubject: ORA-01450:= maximum key length (3215) exceeded -- Can't create index =0Aonline with an= nvarchar2 column=0A=0A=0ATABLE_NAME=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 COLUMN_NAME=A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 DATA_TYPE=A0 =A0 =A0 DATA_LENGTH =0ACHAR_LENGTH=0A=0AMK= _TEST_LENGTH_N351=A0 =A0 INVOICE_ID=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 NUMBER=A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 22 =0A0=0A=0AMK_TEST_LENGTH_N351=A0 =A0 DATA_FIELD_ID= =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 NUMBER=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 22 =0A0=0A=0AMK_TEST_= LENGTH_N351=A0 =A0 ADDITIONAL_DATA_N351=A0 =A0 NVARCHAR2=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 105= 3 =0A351=0A=0AUsing the formula above, I calculate the key length to be 105= 3 =0A(v_additional_data) + 22 (invoice_id) + 22 (data_field_id) + 3 (number= of =0Acolumns) + 2 (length of key) + 8 (ROWID) + 1 (length of rowid) =3D 2= 011, which is =0Anot close to 3215. As we are using UTF8, I would have expe= cted that the number =0Aof nvarchar2 characters I could have used would hav= e been 1/3 of a varchar2 =0Acolumn (3155 vs. 1031), and not approximately 1= /9th (350) the size.=0A=0A=0A--=0Ahttp://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l= =0A=0A=0A------------------------------------------------------------------= ----=0AThis message and any attachments are intended only for the use of th= e addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential= . If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authoriz= ed representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that a= ny dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have = received this communication in error, notify the sender immediately by retu= rn email and delete the message and any attachments from your system.=0A--= =0Ahttp://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l=0A=0A=0A--=0Ahttp://www.freeli= sts.org/webpage/oracle-l --0-1770168762-1314649842=:15352 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<= SPAN style=3D"RIGHT: auto">Before you do check how NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS is = set; it may be set for CHAR rather than BYTE.  If it's set correctly (= BYTE) and this still occurs submit an SR.
 
David Fitzjarrell
 

From:= "Kudryk, Mark" <Mark_Kudryk@ADP.com>
To: "oracle-l@freelists.org" <oracle-l@fr= eelists.org>
Sent: Mo= nday, August 29, 2011 1:08 PM
Subje= ct: RE: ORA-01450: maximum key length (3215) exceeded -- Can't c= reate index online with an nvarchar2 column

I've looked at th= e trace.  Here's the portion where the index is being created...

********************************************************= ************************

create index MK_INDEX_NVARCHAR_N351 ON mk_t= est_length_n351 (data_field_id,
  UPPER(additional_data_n351), inv= oice_id) tablespace indx online


call    count  &n= bsp;   cpu    elapsed      disk    =   query    current        rows
------= - ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  -= ---------
Parse        1      0.01&nb= sp;     0.02          0    &nb= sp;     1          0     =     0
Execute      1      0.02&= nbsp;     0.01          0    &= nbsp;     1        27          0
Fetch        0    =   0.00      0.00          0&nb= sp;         0          0 =         0
------- ------  -------- ---------- = ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------
total    &nb= sp;   2      0.03      0.03   =       0          2    &n= bsp;   27          0

Misses in library= cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: FIRST_ROWS
Parsing user id: 12= 1 
***************************************************************= *****************

And here is the portion where the IOT is being cre= ated.

**************************************************************= ******************

create table "DOCPADMIN"."SYS_JOURNAL_425558" (C0 NUMBER, C1 NVARCHAR2(1053),
 = ; C2 NUMBER,  opcode char(1), partno number,  rid rowid, primary = key( C0, C1,
  C2 , rid )) organization index TABLESPACE "INDX"

call    count      cpu    elaps= ed      disk      query    current&= nbsp;       rows
------- ------  -------- ----------= ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------
Parse    &n= bsp;   1      0.02      0.00   = ;       0          0    &= nbsp;     0          0
Execute  =     1      0.01      0.01  &nb= sp;       0          0   =       3          0
Fetch        0      0.00  &nb= sp;   0.00          0      &nb= sp;   0          0       =   0
------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ----------= ----------  ----------
total        2  &n= bsp;   0.03      0.01         = 0          0          3&= nbsp;         0

Misses in library cache during p= arse: 1
Optimizer mode: FIRST_ROWS
Parsing user id: 121    = (recursive depth: 1)
***************************************************= *****************************

Initially when I read this, I assumed = the NVARCHAR2(1053) was defined in bytes (351 * 3).  But it's not... i= t's in characters, the data length of this field in the IOT will actually be 3159.  Plugging this value into the formula, I get an ove= rall length of 3217, which exceeds the limit.

I'll raise an SR.
<= BR>Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: o= racle-l-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bo= unce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Kudryk, Mark (ES)
Sent: Monday, Aug= ust 29, 2011 1:54 PM
To: oracle-l@freelists.org
Subject:= RE: ORA-01450: maximum key length (3215) exceeded -- Can't create index on= line with an nvarchar2 column

Thanks. Mea Culpa on the length.
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@freelists= .org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org= ] On Behalf Of Jonathan Lewis
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 12:28 PM
= To: oracle-l@freelists.org
Subject: Re: ORA-01450: maximum = key length (3215) exceeded -- Can't create index online with an nvarchar2 c= olumn


I would enable sql_trace and look at the create statement = produced for the
journalling IOT.
Your 2011 is wrong, it should be 1= ,111; if (for no good reason) you multiply the
column length by 3 (agai= n), the answer comes to 3217.

So, taking a guess, Oracle has taken t= he data length as 3 x char_length, and
then the journal code has define= d it's char_length as the result - which has
taken ITS data_length to 9 times the original char_length.

Raise an SR if I'm right.

Re= gards

Jonathan Lewis
http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com


-----= Original Message -----
From: "Kudryk, Mark" <Mark_Kudryk@ADP.com= >
To: <oracle-l@freelists.org>
Sent: Monday= , August 29, 2011 5:05 PM
Subject: ORA-01450: maximum key length (3215) = exceeded -- Can't create index
online with an nvarchar2 column

<= BR>TABLE_NAME            COLUMN_NAME  &n= bsp;         DATA_TYPE      DATA_LENGTH =
CHAR_LENGTH

MK_TEST_LENGTH_N351    INVOICE_ID  &n= bsp;           NUMBER        &= nbsp;   22
0

MK_TEST_LENGTH_N351    DATA_FIELD_ID = ;           NUMBER        &nbs= p;   22
0

MK_TEST_LENGTH_N351    ADDITIONAL_DATA_= N351    NVARCHAR2        1053
351

= Using the formula above, I calculate the key length to be 1053
(v_addit= ional_data) + 22 (invoice_id) + 22 (data_field_id) + 3 (number of
colum= ns) + 2 (length of key) + 8 (ROWID) + 1 (length of rowid) =3D 2011, which i= s
not close to 3215. As we are using UTF8, I would have expected that t= he number
of nvarchar2 characters I could have used would have been 1/3= of a varchar2
column (3155 vs. 1031), and not approximately 1/9th (350= ) the size.


--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


-= ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Th= is message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the address= ee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the = reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized repres= entative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissem= ination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received = this communication in error, notify the sender immediately by return email = and delete the message and any attachments from your system.
--
http://www= .freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


--
http://www.freelists.org/we= bpage/oracle-l




--0-1770168762-1314649842=:15352-- -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l