Re: How much RAM is to much
From: <przemolicc_at_poczta.fm>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 10:00:32 +0200
Message-ID: <20110421080031.GA5980_at_host.pgf.com.pl>
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 04:05:22PM -0700, kyle Hailey wrote:
> What metrics tell you that filesystemio_options=directio "works even better
> then 'forcedirectio' option used on filesystem side." ?
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 10:00:32 +0200
Message-ID: <20110421080031.GA5980_at_host.pgf.com.pl>
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 04:05:22PM -0700, kyle Hailey wrote:
> What metrics tell you that filesystemio_options=directio "works even better
> then 'forcedirectio' option used on filesystem side." ?
No metrics.
When I use filesystemio_options=setall (not =directio !!!) and mount
this particular filesystem _without_ 'forcedirectio' option it gives me two options:
1. direct and asynchronous access to all files where rdbms prefers such access (the most important)
2. cacheable access to all other files (some files are accessed faster when they are "behind" cache)
> On Solaris, I didn't notice any difference between
> filesystemio_options=directio and using forcedirectio on the mount. If
> either one of them was set my performance was similar.
We don't use filesystemio_options=directio, only filesystemio_options=setall.
Regards
Przemyslaw Bak (przemol)
-- http://przemol.blogspot.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ksiazka kucharska za darmo! Prawie setka przepisow na jajka! Pobierz > http://linkint.pl/f2995 -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu Apr 21 2011 - 03:00:32 CDT