Received: (qmail 18552 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2011 15:44:45 -0600 Received: from freelists-180.iquest.net (HELO turing.freelists.org) (206.53.239.180) by static-ip-85-25-126-90.inaddr.intergenia.de with SMTP; 2 Feb 2011 15:44:31 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 8C490D64899; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:44:23 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=freelists.org; s=turing; t=1296683063; bh=0yMqdhHmNwL7t4XcCqxl72RqUqOF146+b9/UqQHP 2tY=; h=Message-ID:Content-Type:From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Sender:Reply-To:List-help:List-unsubscribe: List-Id:List-subscribe:List-owner:List-post:List-archive; b=GfmYSf vt3cNEx2FmkxhrTIP06o41G40FAl2D+um0kYRqImm+1zZa68WmHjcaNrjbPY8tIRilL OUlrVk6Hyv+je4kRqvXsB0zmL7pDxQZnSkMkJAmPyJCBf95bQ2oIZ0sfwglBXaBi7Wv bXi/V6PToArvLWJ2/Ez+cvM9d2srYtY= X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at localhost.localdomain Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id df+kRziDh8OY; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:44:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 8B927D644C2; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:43:39 -0500 (EST) Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Wed, 02 Feb 2011 16:42:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 095F5D64774 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:42:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iN5JN2rI70Fl for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:42:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from blu0-omc1-s7.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc1-s7.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.18]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id BA6CFD64487 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:42:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from BLU129-W3 ([65.55.116.9]) by blu0-omc1-s7.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 2 Feb 2011 13:42:55 -0800 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_69f127f6-fe8b-49cf-8087-ff6acd0ef990_" X-Originating-IP: [207.69.174.16] From: Upendra N To: , Subject: RE: clusterware upgrade question Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:42:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Feb 2011 21:42:55.0557 (UTC) FILETIME=[26B01750:01CBC322] X-archive-position: 34108 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-to: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: nupendra@hotmail.com Precedence: normal Reply-To: nupendra@hotmail.com List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: oracle-l X-List-ID: oracle-l List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: oracle-l --_69f127f6-fe8b-49cf-8087-ff6acd0ef990_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I don't believe you can do a rolling upgrade of clusterware until 11.2.0.1. http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e17128/chapter1.htm= #NEWFTCH1 -Upendra From: eglewis71@gmail.com To: oracle-l@freelists.org Subject: clusterware upgrade question Date: Wed=2C 2 Feb 2011 16:05:32 -0500 Hi=2C I'm getting ready to=20 upgrade our current cluster from 10.2.0.4 to 10.2.0.5 (Solaris=20 64-bit). The components being upgraded include=20 clusterware=2C RAC=2C ASM=2C RDBMS =2C and=20 Dataguard. =20 In regard to the clusterware=2C we=20 have a 2 node cluster. In the patch notes=2C it states that all Oracle=20 database instances on all cluster nodes=2C must be shut down before=20 applying the=20 clusterware patch. Later on in the notes=2C it states=20 that a rolling upgrade for the clusterware can be done.=20 I'm seeing conflcting messages here. I've done rolling upgrades before with patch sets=2C but not with an=20 upgrade. I've contacted Oracle support about this=2Cbut they=20 were of little help.=20 =20 Can the clusterware upgrade be=20 done in a rolling fashion ? =20 In regard to Dataguard. We=20 have physical standby=2C 2 - node cluster. From what I understand=2C the physical standby should=20 be upgraded before the primary database (in this case a cluster). Once=20 that is done=2C the primary environment is then upgraded. Does the=20 primary need to be upgraded at the same time ? Can it=20 be upgraded a day or a week later ? =20 thanks =20 =20 =20 ed = --_69f127f6-fe8b-49cf-8087-ff6acd0ef990_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I don't believe you can do a rolling upgrade of clusterware until 11.2.0.1.=
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e17128/chapter1= .htm#NEWFTCH1

-Upendra



From: = eglewis71@gmail.com
To: oracle-l@freelists.org
Subject: clusterware u= pgrade question
Date: Wed=2C 2 Feb 2011 16:05:32 -0500

Hi=2C
 =3B =3B =3B I'm getting r= eady to=20 upgrade our current cluster
from 10.2.0.4 to 10.2.0.5 (Solaris=20 64-bit).
The components being upgraded include =
clusterware=2C RAC=2C ASM=2C RDBMS =2C= and=20 Dataguard.
 =3B
 =3B =3B =3BIn regard to t= he clusterware=2C we=20 have a 2 node cluster.
In the patch notes=2C it states that a= ll Oracle=20 database instances
on all cluster nodes=2C must be shut d= own before=20 applying the
clusterware patch. Later on in the not= es=2C it states=20 that a
rolling upgrade for the clusterware ca= n be done.=20 I'm seeing
conflcting messages here.
 =3B =3B =3B  =3BI've = done rolling upgrades before with pa= tch sets=2C but not with an=20 upgrade.
I've contacted Oracle support about th= is=2Cbut they=20 were of little help.
 =3B
 =3B =3B =3B Can the clust= erware upgrade be=20 done in a rolling fashion ?
 =3B
 =3B =3B =3B =3B In re= gard to Dataguard. We=20 have physical standby=2C 2 - node cluster.
From what I understand=2C the physical= standby should=20 be upgraded before
the primary database (in this case a c= luster). Once=20 that is done=2C the
primary environment is then upgraded.<= /font>
 =3B =3B =3B  =3B = =3B =3B Does the=20 primary need to be upgraded at the same time ? Can it
be upgraded a day or a week later ?
 =3B
 =3B =3B =3B thanks = =3B =3B =3B=20  =3B =3B =3B
 =3B
ed
 =3B =3B =3B
= = --_69f127f6-fe8b-49cf-8087-ff6acd0ef990_-- -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l