Received: (qmail 27487 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2010 13:16:56 -0500
Received: from freelists-180.iquest.net (HELO turing.freelists.org) (206.53.239.180)
  by static-ip-85-25-126-90.inaddr.intergenia.de with SMTP; 10 Oct 2010 13:16:52 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 3F120D40BE4;
 Sun, 10 Oct 2010 14:16:51 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=freelists.org;
 s=turing; t=1286734611; bh=Bun2h8QZvm1rrDDJK5Sqs315WcsQAGX5mmDiQMiY
 lOs=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:
	 In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender:Reply-To:
	 List-help:List-unsubscribe:List-Id:List-subscribe:List-owner:
	 List-post:List-archive; b=arRyyZJflLBEFK1SZDfyT6O6ZUwrx2Sc+KS+67UF
 YMfcPhOBH8yxrM3tJdIl4st9uZPYYyiBDDLLjP9ASgoGcfhtQSy731N3+rfnnGGJ1S8
 XGPETjiWwQzV8lWYiZNaMf183qAYlYq9/jf8fonVzwll/lcZrKzuWoUhA7IPkKuA=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at localhost.localdomain
Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 3nRwisRSK3N3; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 14:16:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from turing.freelists.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 947AFD40D2B;
 Sun, 10 Oct 2010 14:16:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Sun, 10 Oct 2010 14:15:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id C9C53D40BFF	for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 14:15:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])	by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)	with ESMTP id UwBSbBbNYw5Y for <oracle-l@freelists.org>;	Sun, 10 Oct 2010 14:15:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.cs.tut.fi (mail.cs.tut.fi [130.230.4.42])	by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 54C38D40BE4	for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 14:15:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from amavis2.cs.tut.fi (amavis2.cs.tut.fi [130.230.4.70])	by mail.cs.tut.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 574CF996	for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 21:15:23 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from mail.cs.tut.fi ([130.230.4.42]) by amavis2.cs.tut.fi (amavis2.cs.tut.fi [130.230.4.70]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23102-05 for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 21:15:22 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [192.168.100.20] (e81-197-73-229.elisa-laajakaista.fi [81.197.73.229])	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by mail.cs.tut.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F58995	for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 21:15:22 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <4CB20214.90103@iki.fi>
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 21:12:36 +0300
From: Timo Raitalaakso <rafu@iki.fi>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100914 Thunderbird/3.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: oracle-l@freelists.org
Subject: Re: nlj batching
References: <AANLkTikQyOyNKp1p+-LT4KRgUvR2CxS3hCFn8iO=M5Dn@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikQyOyNKp1p+-LT4KRgUvR2CxS3hCFn8iO=M5Dn@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-archive-position: 31507
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
Errors-to: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
X-original-sender: rafu@iki.fi
Precedence: normal
Reply-To: rafu@iki.fi
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@freelists.org?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <oracle-l-request@freelists.org?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-Id: oracle-l <oracle-l.freelists.org>
X-List-ID: oracle-l <oracle-l.freelists.org>
List-subscribe: <oracle-l-request@freelists.org?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:steve.adams@ixora.com.au>
List-post: <mailto:oracle-l@freelists.org>
List-archive: <http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l>
X-list: oracle-l


Is there something else to say that is not in documentation?
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e16638/optimops.htm#BABFCIAI

--
Rafu
http://rafudb.blogspot.com/

On 10.10.2010 20:39, joshuasingham wrote:
> Hi all,
> I been going through some notes and wandering if anybody know the 
> benefits of nlj batching for example in 10g i get this plan (as shown 
> below) which then in 11g in converts into 2 nested loop join my 
> question  would be why will this be a good compared to 10g
>
> Oracle 10g
> ------------------------------------------------
> | Id  | Operation                      | Name  |
> ------------------------------------------------
> |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT               |       |
> |   1 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID  | T2    |
> |   2 |    NESTED LOOPS                |       |
> |   3 |     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T1    |
> |*  4 |      INDEX RANGE SCAN          | T1_N1 |
> |*  5 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN           | T2_N1 |
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Oracle 11g
> ------------------------------------------------
> | Id  | Operation                      | Name  |
> ------------------------------------------------
> |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT               |       |
> |   1 |   NESTED LOOPS                 |       |
> |   2 |    NESTED LOOPS                |       |
> |   3 |     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T1    |
> |*  4 |      INDEX RANGE SCAN          | T1_N1 |
> |*  5 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN           | T2_N1 |
> |   6 |    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | T2    |
>
> thanks
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


