Received: (qmail 5489 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2009 15:57:29 -0600
Received: from freelists-180.iquest.net (HELO turing.freelists.org) (206.53.239.180)
  by static-ip-85-25-126-90.inaddr.intergenia.de with SMTP; 11 Nov 2009 15:57:25 -0600
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 74EA4CBA270;
 Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:57:24 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at localhost.localdomain
Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id K4LivF7w2+4o; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:57:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from turing.freelists.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 027AECBA1C1;
 Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:56:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:56:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 57D33CB9ECD	for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:56:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])	by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)	with ESMTP id HFIhIObWbXqi for <oracle-l@freelists.org>;	Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:56:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from nospam5.slac.stanford.edu (nospam5.slac.stanford.edu [134.79.18.83])	by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 1C60FCB868A	for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:56:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from exch-anon.win.slac.stanford.edu (exch-anon.slac.stanford.edu [172.23.70.42])	by nospam5.slac.stanford.edu (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id nABLu1ro011484	for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0800	(envelope-from ian@slac.stanford.edu)
Received: from exch-mail2.win.slac.stanford.edu ([172.23.70.52]) by exch-anon.win.slac.stanford.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);	 Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:55:11 -0800
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
Subject: RE: uptime
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:51:02 -0800
Message-ID: <7F24308CD176594B8F14969D10C02C6C024476FF@exch-mail2.win.slac.stanford.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4641e08817cba66541e759395ebb18d6.squirrel@society.servebeer.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: uptime
References: <bf46380911101754v48bad0c9lb2b0e309c0c67d8a@mail.gmail.com>    <7F24308CD176594B8F14969D10C02C6C024476FC@exch-mail2.win.slac.stanford.edu> <4641e08817cba66541e759395ebb18d6.squirrel@society.servebeer.com>
From: "MacGregor, Ian A." <ian@slac.stanford.edu>
To: "Oracle-L Freelists" <oracle-l@freelists.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Nov 2009 21:55:11.0755 (UTC) FILETIME=[A46EFDB0:01CA6319]
X-archive-position: 22574
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
Errors-to: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
X-original-sender: ian@slac.stanford.edu
Precedence: normal
Reply-to: ian@slac.stanford.edu
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@freelists.org?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <oracle-l-request@freelists.org?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-Id: oracle-l <oracle-l.freelists.org>
X-List-ID: oracle-l <oracle-l.freelists.org>
List-subscribe: <oracle-l-request@freelists.org?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:steve.adams@ixora.com.au>
List-post: <mailto:oracle-l@freelists.org>
List-archive: <http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l>
X-list: oracle-l

Security is not in the eyes of the beholder.  A vulnerabilities exist or
they do not.  Certainly sites need to evaluate whether the vulnerability
is applicable and whether they have taken other measures to prevent its
exploitation, etc. I am not a system administrator  nor a security
expert,  but RedHat has been rather busy lately with kernel releases to
fix security issues.

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Rich Jesse
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 8:27 AM
To: Oracle-L Freelists
Subject: RE: uptime

> Impressive!  What do you do about security problems with the OS.  Does
> not  the installation of a new kernel require a reboot

Security is in the eye of the keyholder -- not everyone needs every
security
update right away.

Once upon a life, we had a dev box that had a 4-digit uptime.  It was
decided that there would be a controlled reboot if only to make sure
that
there were no undocumented "fixes" in startup, since there was some
personnel changes in the department.  Kind of a bummer...

And don't get me started on VMS uptimes.  Oh, those were the days...  :)

Rich

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


