Received: (qmail 4869 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2009 05:35:13 -0600
Received: from freelists-180.iquest.net (HELO turing.freelists.org) (206.53.239.180)
  by static-ip-85-25-126-90.inaddr.intergenia.de with SMTP; 11 Nov 2009 05:35:10 -0600
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 61433CBA2ED;
 Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:35:07 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at localhost.localdomain
Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id VCvuApEnze0g; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:35:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from turing.freelists.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id AF590CBA2BF;
 Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:34:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:33:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id C74D1CBA281	for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:33:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])	by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)	with ESMTP id X-kVFaYvCnDZ for <oracle-l@freelists.org>;	Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:33:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail-vw0-f179.google.com (mail-vw0-f179.google.com [209.85.212.179])	by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 81E51CBA26E	for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:33:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: by vws9 with SMTP id 9so274872vws.20        for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:33:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:from:date:message-id         :subject:to:content-type;        bh=bUZMTKFlthu1/LpQ35l05hqY/1mk23F5wr2B964Jq40=;        b=XEGl+EO273gEpiEtWPnH44iL3Z72E010HWPzXpJWdGWIJe6XFoICdBueJh2l1yrVjE         nV/V0IkHfFXwLOcSFOKuMaVkqASFCYKqjRjg3WHsbbAjFE1UFpRJVjSxe5Jfdfo7BFV6         jlxVE8YqlwZyS42aiKHCJPzRIV/YGSo1hUQzQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;        h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;        b=n+VKF/dRR2OGeHoVKJ+1UN1ettW24ZM0PN/SBm/nMLAis8CQDm+8NM7IOwA77fZcAj         7R8n1AtD5AdjxewGTT4XIRtTiwUJyW3xJL99xKuum5k2h7euJYeAv/vJUgpRO22zoGjk         UmGjguDYGiOaHUCNWAJ06gaGBFgV3/1ku/Eos=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.126.144 with SMTP id c16mr1639940vcs.43.1257939224111; 	Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:33:44 -0800 (PST)
From: Amir Gheibi <gheibia@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:33:24 +0800
Message-ID: <c906cd460911110333i71cc3249pa2e7ba1110bad874@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Bind Variables vs Literals -
To: ORACLE-L <oracle-l@freelists.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c930c89a2c4c047816cca7
X-archive-position: 22521
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
Errors-to: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
X-original-sender: gheibia@gmail.com
Precedence: normal
Reply-to: gheibia@gmail.com
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@freelists.org?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <oracle-l-request@freelists.org?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-Id: oracle-l <oracle-l.freelists.org>
X-List-ID: oracle-l <oracle-l.freelists.org>
List-subscribe: <oracle-l-request@freelists.org?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:steve.adams@ixora.com.au>
List-post: <mailto:oracle-l@freelists.org>
List-archive: <http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l>
X-list: oracle-l
--001636c930c89a2c4c047816cca7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi Listers,

I have two questions.

- I know what using literals in SQL can do to the SGA. My question is
actually very simple. If literals are used in Stored Procedures, since
procedures are loaded and compiled once when they are called, would that
cause problems as well?
- In the alert log, I noticed that there are lots of these messages: "Heap
size 2122K exceeds notification threshold (2048K)". What does that indicate?

Regards,
~ Amir Gheibi

--001636c930c89a2c4c047816cca7
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Listers,<div><br></div><div>I have two questions.<br><div><br></div><div=
>- I know what using literals in SQL can do to the SGA. My question is actu=
ally very simple. If literals are used in Stored Procedures, since procedur=
es are loaded and compiled once when they are called, would that cause prob=
lems as well?</div>

<div>- In the alert log, I noticed that there are lots of these messages: &=
quot;Heap size 2122K exceeds notification threshold (2048K)&quot;. What doe=
s that indicate?</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>~ Amir Gheibi<=
/div>

</div>

--001636c930c89a2c4c047816cca7--
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


