Received: (qmail 14397 invoked from network); 5 May 2009 07:43:47 -0500
Received: from freelists-180.iquest.net (HELO turing.freelists.org) (206.53.239.180)
  by static-ip-85-25-126-90.inaddr.intergenia.de with SMTP; 5 May 2009 07:42:51 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 76AAAC395BD;
 Tue,  5 May 2009 08:42:51 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at localhost.localdomain
Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id Gkwg9FuuTlVG; Tue,  5 May 2009 08:42:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from turing.freelists.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id E8A98C3A470;
 Tue,  5 May 2009 08:42:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Tue, 05 May 2009 08:40:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 5D9CBC39A73	for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Tue,  5 May 2009 08:40:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])	by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)	with ESMTP id qrmbgUsWM4Vq for <oracle-l@freelists.org>;	Tue,  5 May 2009 08:40:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from exchange.gridapp.com (exchange.gridapp.com [208.50.120.117])	by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 1AC99C39938	for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Tue,  5 May 2009 08:40:36 -0400 (EDT)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C9CD7E.AF41592F"
Subject: Oracle EM Provisioning/patching pack
Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 08:40:34 -0400
Message-ID: <C0A5E31718FC064A91E9FD7BE2F081B101D4B8D4@exchange.gridapp.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: Oracle EM Provisioning/patching pack
From: "Matthew Zito" <mzito@gridapp.com>
To: <oracle-l@freelists.org>
X-archive-position: 17426
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
Errors-to: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
X-original-sender: mzito@gridapp.com
Precedence: normal
Reply-to: mzito@gridapp.com
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@freelists.org?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <oracle-l-request@freelists.org?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-Id: oracle-l <oracle-l.freelists.org>
X-List-ID: oracle-l <oracle-l.freelists.org>
List-subscribe: <oracle-l-request@freelists.org?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:steve.adams@ixora.com.au>
List-post: <mailto:oracle-l@freelists.org>
List-archive: <http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l>
X-list: oracle-l
------_=_NextPart_001_01C9CD7E.AF41592F
Content-Type: text/plain; 
 charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Hey all,

The recent thread on OEM's pluses and minuses got me thinking, but I =
didn't want to completely hijack the thread, so I figured I'd start a =
new one.  It seems like most people use OEM/GC for day-to-day DBA =
activities - monitoring, checking utilization, running basic database =
commands, and for performance tuning, basically the tuning and =
diagnostic pack.

I'm curious as to why no one mentioned the provisioning pack, which =
Oracle markets as a solution for patching, database creation, cloning, =
etc.  Is it too expensive?  Does it not work?  Are patching and =
deployment just not a problem for the folks on this list?  What about =
RAC - it's supposed to be able to do RAC deployment, has anyone tried =
that?

As full disclosure, my company makes a software product that, among many =
other things, patches database, deploys RAC clusters, automates =
upgrades, etc.  The reason I'm asking is when we're meeting with =
companies at trade shows, etc., a commonly heard refrain is, "Oh, OEM =
provisioning pack does all that stuff".  Once we dig into it a bit, =
though, they've usually never tried it, or don't run OEM at all.

So, I figured I'd ask the list- have you ever used the provisioning =
pack, and what did you think?  If you don't use it, why not?  If people =
would prefer to email me off-list, I'll aggregate the info, anonymize =
it, and send it back to the list?

Thanks,
Matt

--
Matthew Zito
Chief Scientist
GridApp Systems
P: 646-452-4090
mzito@gridapp.com
http://www.gridapp.com


------_=_NextPart_001_01C9CD7E.AF41592F
Content-Type: text/html; 
 charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
6.5.7652.24">
<TITLE>Oracle EM Provisioning/patching pack</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<BR>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Hey all,<BR>
<BR>
The recent thread on OEM's pluses and minuses got me thinking, but I =
didn't want to completely hijack the thread, so I figured I'd start a =
new one.&nbsp; It seems like most people use OEM/GC for day-to-day DBA =
activities - monitoring, checking utilization, running basic database =
commands, and for performance tuning, basically the tuning and =
diagnostic pack.<BR>
<BR>
I'm curious as to why no one mentioned the provisioning pack, which =
Oracle markets as a solution for patching, database creation, cloning, =
etc.&nbsp; Is it too expensive?&nbsp; Does it not work?&nbsp; Are =
patching and deployment just not a problem for the folks on this =
list?&nbsp; What about RAC - it's supposed to be able to do RAC =
deployment, has anyone tried that?<BR>
<BR>
As full disclosure, my company makes a software product that, among many =
other things, patches database, deploys RAC clusters, automates =
upgrades, etc.&nbsp; The reason I'm asking is when we're meeting with =
companies at trade shows, etc., a commonly heard refrain is, &quot;Oh, =
OEM provisioning pack does all that stuff&quot;.&nbsp; Once we dig into =
it a bit, though, they've usually never tried it, or don't run OEM at =
all.<BR>
<BR>
So, I figured I'd ask the list- have you ever used the provisioning =
pack, and what did you think?&nbsp; If you don't use it, why not?&nbsp; =
If people would prefer to email me off-list, I'll aggregate the info, =
anonymize it, and send it back to the list?<BR>
<BR>
Thanks,<BR>
Matt<BR>
<BR>
--<BR>
Matthew Zito<BR>
Chief Scientist<BR>
GridApp Systems<BR>
P: 646-452-4090<BR>
mzito@gridapp.com<BR>
<A HREF=3D"http://www.gridapp.com">http://www.gridapp.com</A><BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C9CD7E.AF41592F--
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


