Received: (qmail 13981 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2009 01:56:47 -0600 Received: from freelists-180.iquest.net (HELO turing.freelists.org) (206.53.239.180) by static-ip-85-25-126-90.inaddr.intergenia.de with SMTP; 2 Feb 2009 01:56:46 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 4B7B5B8F77D; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 02:56:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27533-04; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 02:56:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id B39D5B8F771; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 02:56:45 -0500 (EST) Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Mon, 02 Feb 2009 02:54:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 6657AB8F604 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 02:54:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26837-01 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 02:54:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from kecgate06.infosys.com (kecgate06.infosysconsulting.com [61.95.162.82]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 0F870B8F5B6 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 02:54:35 -0500 (EST) X-TM-IMSS-Message-ID:<3e32262100024a3e@kecgate06.infosys.com> Received: from blrkechub04.ad.infosys.com ([10.66.236.44]) by kecgate06.infosys.com ([61.95.162.82]) with ESMTP (TREND IMSS SMTP Service 7.0; TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,128bits,RC4-MD5) id 3e32262100024a3e ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:24:53 +0530 Received: from BLRKECMBX02.ad.infosys.com ([10.66.236.22]) by blrkechub04.ad.infosys.com ([10.66.236.44]) with mapi; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:24:30 +0530 From: VIVEK_SHARMA To: ORACLE-L Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:24:29 +0530 Subject: RE: NFS Storage Versus SAN/NAS Storages - Performance Comparisons...somewhat OT Thread-Topic: NFS Storage Versus SAN/NAS Storages - Performance Comparisons...somewhat OT Message-ID: <69E1360E54B50C4A828A136C158E4742056A69D878@BLRKECMBX02.ad.infosys.com> References: <69E1360E54B50C4A828A136C158E4742056A69D32C@BLRKECMBX02.ad.infosys.com> In-Reply-To: <69E1360E54B50C4A828A136C158E4742056A69D32C@BLRKECMBX02.ad.infosys.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_69E1360E54B50C4A828A136C158E4742056A69D878BLRKECMBX02ad_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-archive-position: 14382 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-to: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: VIVEK_SHARMA@infosys.com Precedence: normal Reply-to: VIVEK_SHARMA@infosys.com List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: oracle-l X-List-ID: oracle-l List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at localhost.localdomain --_000_69E1360E54B50C4A828A136C158E4742056A69D878BLRKECMBX02ad_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Folks Specific to Network Filesystem (NFS/NAS only) following are the comparative= Storage benchmark results of various Vendors:- http://www.spec.org/sfs97r1/results/sfs97r1.html "Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation" (http://www.spec.org/) Result= s are also Officially quoted by various organizations like NetApp etc For NFS it is SPEC, NOT SPC. Cheers & Thanks V much ________________________________ From: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org] = On Behalf Of VIVEK_SHARMA Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 6:18 PM To: ORACLE-L Subject: NFS Storage Versus SAN/NAS Storages - Performance Comparisons...so= mewhat OT Folks 1) Need Storage Performance comparison results between NFS Storage Versus S= AN/NAS Storages. Will SPC benchmarks provide these results? Any Docs / Links pls? 2) What Units from the comparative storage Benchmarks need to be Compared -= is it IOPS , what else ? Cheers & Thanks V much Vivek **************** CAUTION - Disclaimer ***************** This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended solel= y for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, ple= ase notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you a= re not to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other p= erson and any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has= taken every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for an= y damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You should carry o= ut your own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys reserves = the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from thi= s e-mail address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the Infosys e-mail system. ***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS*** --_000_69E1360E54B50C4A828A136C158E4742056A69D878BLRKECMBX02ad_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Folks=

 

Specific to <= span style=3D'font-weight:bold'>Network Filesystem (NFS/NAS only) fol= lowing are the comparative Storage benchmark results of various Vendors:-

 

http://www.spec.org/sfs97r1/results/sfs97r1.html 

 

"Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation" (http:= //www.spec.org/) Results are also Officially = quoted by various organizations like = NetApp etc

 

For NFS it is SPEC, NOT SPC.

 

Cheers & Tha= nks V much

 

 

From: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of VIVEK_SHARMA
Sent: Friday, January 30, 20= 09 6:18 PM
To: ORACLE-L
Subject: NFS Storage Versus SAN/NAS Storages - Performance Comparisons...somewhat OT=

 

Folks

 

1) Need = Storage Performance comparison results between NFS Storage Versus S= AN/NAS Storages.

Will SPC benchma= rks provide these results? Any Docs / Links pls?

 

2) What Units fr= om the comparative storage Benchmarks need to be Compared - is it IOPS , what else ?

 

Cheers & Tha= nks V much

 

Vivek

***************=
* CAUTION - Disclaimer *****************
This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended solel=
y=20
for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, ple=
ase=20
notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you a=
re not=20
to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other p=
erson and=20
any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has=
 taken=20
every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for an=
y damage=20
you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You should carry o=
ut your=20
own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys reserves =
the=20
right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from thi=
s e-mail=20
address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the=
=20
Infosys e-mail system.
***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS***
= --_000_69E1360E54B50C4A828A136C158E4742056A69D878BLRKECMBX02ad_-- -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l