Return-Path: <oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org>
Delivered-To: 2-oracle-l@orafaq.com
Received: (qmail 1228 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2008 02:34:37 -0500
Received: from freelists-180.iquest.net (HELO turing.freelists.org) (206.53.239.180)
  by air964.startdedicated.com with SMTP; 9 Sep 2008 02:34:37 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 8A48D93E8B6;
 Tue,  9 Sep 2008 03:34:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 03770-03; Tue, 9 Sep 2008 03:34:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from turing.freelists.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 0232B93E059;
 Tue,  9 Sep 2008 03:34:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Tue, 09 Sep 2008 03:32:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 87C8293DCA0	for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Tue,  9 Sep 2008 03:32:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])	by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)	with ESMTP id 03400-07 for <oracle-l@freelists.org>;	Tue, 9 Sep 2008 03:32:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173])	by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 04C1193DB05	for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Tue,  9 Sep 2008 03:32:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id x30so97355ugc.11        for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to         :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;        bh=B2WpfKkfuLftat2pJT3o8JIu4RxF9+rDq03esx2ggXE=;        b=URGCBs0IHxRbsqr3+hUGL9cTGAvSDXN066lMYQy2+2lr35SJdylU3WNdKO+VkIfrS8         eJVU1heehuZ6JPqJ660Z5nDjVUynoQGkaQpdjVMcN236wsNQybuJPSbNOgWCJBsBDWXb         wBn3enUDz8zYs4SZP21Lxad44i0z/BMuJro0s=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version         :content-type:references;        b=npuP9XJPUA+GlcIvb/nh3CqVHc+aqcNF4oVf9Eh4vqCtibBeXzNAHaXR5xFhnKGIYU         rv2zCzmnY4DqXqKdK8ysBn8++D0XdmnDZD8ebGm886Uffsvg6XdpTVX7Ke6jnPcRKQI+         szQXMXyzl+/9nuixh/dYtkbjAKMzh8STne0hg=
Received: by 10.66.238.16 with SMTP id l16mr4961547ugh.19.1220945547971;        Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:32:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.67.15.20 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Sep 2008 00:32:27 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <97b7fd2f0809090032l188c5d62yf756e59652953352@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 10:32:27 +0300
From: "Syed Jaffar Hussain" <sjaffarhussain@gmail.com>
To: sharmakdeep_oracle@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Measuring the impact of Redo Log change
Cc: oracle-l@freelists.org
In-Reply-To: <809219.91656.qm@web52809.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_97617_14726457.1220945548036"
References: <809219.91656.qm@web52809.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
X-archive-position: 10685
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
Errors-to: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
X-original-sender: sjaffarhussain@gmail.com
Precedence: normal
Reply-to: sjaffarhussain@gmail.com
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@freelists.org?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <oracle-l-request@freelists.org?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-Id: oracle-l <oracle-l.freelists.org>
X-List-ID: oracle-l <oracle-l.freelists.org>
List-subscribe: <oracle-l-request@freelists.org?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:steve.adams@ixora.com.au>
List-post: <mailto:oracle-l@freelists.org>
List-archive: <http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l>
X-list: oracle-l
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at localhost.localdomain
------=_Part_97617_14726457.1220945548036
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

We have seen significant improvements when we enable CIO option of the JFS2
filesystem where redo logs resides.If you are on JFS2 filesystem, I would
recommend you to have a try with CIO option enable on this filesystem (where
redo logs resides).

Regards,

Jaffar

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Deepak Sharma
<sharmakdeep_oracle@yahoo.com>wrote:

> We recently (today) moved the redo logs from RAID5 to RAID1+0.
>
> The obvious reason of doing this is to make things better in terms of
> performance, as RAID1+0 is better suited for read/writes. Someone pls
> correct me if that's not true.
>
> What are different ways to measure the impact of this change?
>
> The platform is AIX, DB is 10.2.0.3 and DB size is 55TB, and 2TB redo is
> generated each day. There are plans underway to reduce the redo generation
> using direct path etc. (so let's not get diverted by that).
>
> We can try measuring the wait event stats using AWR, session stats etc.,
> but what exactly to look for?  'log file switch completion', 'log file
> sync', are some things that come to mind - what else?
>
> Thanks,
> Deepak
>
>
>


-- 
Best Regards,

Syed Jaffar Hussain
Oracle ACE
8i,9i & 10g OCP DBA
RAC Certified Expert

Official Oracle RAC SIG Representative for Saudi Arabian region (
http://www.oracleracsig.org/)
http://jaffardba.blogspot.com/
http://apex.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=19297:4:1579866181463918::NO:4:P4_ID:126
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Winners don't do different things. They do things differently."

------=_Part_97617_14726457.1220945548036
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

<div dir="ltr">We have seen&nbsp;significant&nbsp;improvements when we enable CIO option of the JFS2 filesystem where redo logs resides.<div>If you are on JFS2 filesystem, I would recommend you to have a try with CIO option enable on this filesystem (where redo logs resides).</div>
<div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div><br></div><div>Jaffar<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Deepak Sharma <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:sharmakdeep_oracle@yahoo.com">sharmakdeep_oracle@yahoo.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div><div style="font-family:Courier New,courier,monaco,monospace,sans-serif;font-size:12pt"><div>We recently (today) moved the redo logs from RAID5 to RAID1+0.<br>
<br>The obvious reason of doing this is to make things better in terms of performance, as RAID1+0 is better suited for read/writes. Someone pls correct me if that&#39;s not true.<br><br>What are different ways to measure the impact of this change? <br>
<br>The platform is AIX, DB is <a href="http://10.2.0.3" target="_blank">10.2.0.3</a> and DB size is 55TB, and 2TB redo is generated each day. There are plans underway to reduce the redo generation using direct path etc. (so let&#39;s not get diverted by that). <br>
<br>We can try measuring the wait event stats using AWR, session stats etc., but what exactly to look for?&nbsp; &#39;log file switch completion&#39;, &#39;log file sync&#39;, are some things that come to mind - what else?<br>
<br>Thanks,<br>Deepak<br><br></div></div><br>

      </div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Best Regards,<br><br>Syed Jaffar Hussain<br>Oracle ACE<br>8i,9i &amp; 10g OCP DBA<br>RAC Certified Expert<br><br>Official Oracle RAC SIG Representative for Saudi Arabian region (<a href="http://www.oracleracsig.org/">http://www.oracleracsig.org/</a>)<br>
<a href="http://jaffardba.blogspot.com/">http://jaffardba.blogspot.com/</a><br><a href="http://apex.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=19297:4:1579866181463918::NO:4:P4_ID:126">http://apex.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=19297:4:1579866181463918::NO:4:P4_ID:126</a><br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>&quot;Winners don&#39;t do different things. They do things differently.&quot;<br>
</div></div>

------=_Part_97617_14726457.1220945548036--
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


