Return-Path: Delivered-To: 2-oracle-l@orafaq.com Received: (qmail 12421 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2007 09:05:15 -0600 Received: from freelists-180.iquest.net (HELO turing.freelists.org) (206.53.239.180) by static-ip-69-64-49-119.inaddr.intergenia.de with SMTP; 12 Dec 2007 09:05:15 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id BFD717D8423; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:05:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05173-02; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:05:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 382E57D827B; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:05:15 -0500 (EST) Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:17:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id B40507D7073 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:17:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28167-01 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:17:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.234]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 8171F7D6CAC for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:17:48 -0500 (EST) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so130441nze.1 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 06:17:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=59uDGGSn6s5Wv69zCk6XUnW6TEjNe8+xe3pcmfDNLyA=; b=WjbcnpxkIH8Nir5zVWpNf1QJtLsGQzoAx9T60bUjsl1IN6XNC+h5NUGWS8/7BFAZiMoBD1MSpzj5U9FuQ5QcKWZHj9QK7d5C/6QozDtUbbWdY5rGf9bLase6Xsh1oHK1P0XHxb/MKWFYfFCOFuGLiBmAKOdOO0gJL4u6jKdQIn8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=CG+96eKSHgtJdK0XRNec5hLkv9tEThqdz4pY+JUIDEjvKxKMJ/fPVr73ot628pqu2W2l2i0OiCwkv0k4SoGwumrnvA4rErdkdpmnAuisfgDf+20C67N9PGAyZC/2eLQRQVNdUiPPFL2Im6KxDc+mdsOf9hmh4tohyTqYB22tou4= Received: by 10.142.230.11 with SMTP id c11mr175436wfh.25.1197469067222; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 06:17:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.244.1 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 06:17:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <97b7fd2f0712120617n2164b7b5re703ac8b4d6e0fa2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:17:47 +0300 From: "Syed Jaffar Hussain" To: "Asif Momen" Subject: Re: hash partitions on 10gR2 RAC database Cc: oracle-l In-Reply-To: <522031.40974.qm@web56613.mail.re3.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1111_7575138.1197469067132" References: <97b7fd2f0712120428n35a3315cr6b4cec13cf277ab9@mail.gmail.com> <522031.40974.qm@web56613.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-archive-position: 3878 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-to: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: sjaffarhussain@gmail.com Precedence: normal Reply-to: sjaffarhussain@gmail.com List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: oracle-l X-List-ID: oracle-l List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at localhost.localdomain ------=_Part_1111_7575138.1197469067132 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Asif, I already knew that bug mentioned in Note:4583442.8. Fortunately, the table doesn't have any LOB columns. Regarding the metalink discussion, one was about behavior in 8i and other one shows the query/index issues. However, what I am really looking for is the behavior on RAC database and any 10g improvement regarding hash algorthm. On 12/12/07, Asif Momen wrote: > > Hi, > > Please check out the following notes/discussions on Metalink: > > 1) > https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/f?p=200:27:10138389227343044570::::p27_id,p27_show_header,p27_show_help:29019.996,1,1 > * > 2) > https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/f?p=200:27:10138389227343044570::::p27_id,p27_show_header,p27_show_help:299978.999,1,1 > > 3) Note:4583442.8 > > Regards > > Asif Momen > http://momendba.blogspot.com > * > *Syed Jaffar Hussain * wrote: > > Hi, > > We are planning to make use of hash partition to one of the heavily > accessed table on a RAC database(Oracle 10gR2). > > Are there any serious bugs/performance issues assosiates with hash > partition on Oracle 10gR2 ? > > > > > > -- > Best Regards, > Syed Jaffar Hussain > Oracle ACE > 8i,9i & 10g OCP DBA > > http://jaffardba.blogspot.com/ > > http://apex.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=19297:4:1579866181463918::NO:4:P4_ID:126 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > "Winners don't do different things. They do things differently." > > > ------------------------------ > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. > > -- Best Regards, Syed Jaffar Hussain Oracle ACE 8i,9i & 10g OCP DBA http://jaffardba.blogspot.com/ http://apex.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=19297:4:1579866181463918::NO:4:P4_ID:126 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Winners don't do different things. They do things differently." ------=_Part_1111_7575138.1197469067132 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
Asif,
 
I already knew that bug mentioned in Note:4583442.8. Fortunately, the table doesn't have any LOB columns.
Regarding the metalink discussion, one was about behavior in 8i and other one shows the query/index issues.
 
However, what I am really looking for is the behavior on RAC database and any 10g improvement regarding hash algorthm.
 
 



 
On 12/12/07, Asif Momen <asif_oracle@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hi,

Please check out the following notes/discussions on Metalink:

1) https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/f?p=200:27:10138389227343044570::::p27_id,p27_show_header,p27_show_help:29019.996,1,1

2) https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/f?p=200:27:10138389227343044570::::p27_id,p27_show_header,p27_show_help:299978.999,1,1

3) Note:4583442.8

Regards

Asif Momen
http://momendba.blogspot.com

Syed Jaffar Hussain <sjaffarhussain@gmail.com > wrote:
Hi,
 
We are planning to make use of hash partition to one of the heavily accessed table on a RAC database(Oracle 10gR2).
 
Are there any serious bugs/performance issues assosiates with hash partition on Oracle 10gR2 ?
 
 
 
 

--
Best Regards,
Syed Jaffar Hussain
Oracle ACE
8i,9i & 10g OCP DBA

http://jaffardba.blogspot.com/
http://apex.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=19297:4:1579866181463918::NO:4:P4_ID:126
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Winners don't do different things. They do things differently."

Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.




--
Best Regards,
Syed Jaffar Hussain
Oracle ACE
8i,9i & 10g OCP DBA

http://jaffardba.blogspot.com/
http://apex.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=19297:4:1579866181463918::NO:4:P4_ID:126
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Winners don't do different things. They do things differently." ------=_Part_1111_7575138.1197469067132-- -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l