Return-Path: Delivered-To: 2-oracle-l@orafaq.com Received: (qmail 4807 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2007 12:08:37 -0600 Received: from freelists-180.iquest.net (HELO turing.freelists.org) (206.53.239.180) by 69.64.49.119 with SMTP; 28 Nov 2007 12:08:29 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 608DE7C5FDA; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:08:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11170-02; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:08:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id C55567C5AB1; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:08:25 -0500 (EST) Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:21:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id E23AD7C58F0 for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:21:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04871-04 for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:21:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from llsa735-a03.servidoresdns.net (llsa735-a03.servidoresdns.net [82.223.190.26]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id A324B7C58C1 for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:20:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from PORT (cm218019.red83-165.mundo-r.com [83.165.218.19]) by smtp-03.servidoresdns.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 032FE954DF; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:20:18 +0100 (CET) From: "Juan Miranda" To: , "'oracle-l-freelists'" , "'oracle-db-l'" , "'oracle tech-old list'" , "'oracle rdbms group'" Subject: RE: x86-64 or itanium Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:20:43 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002D_01C831EB.64D42740" In-Reply-To: <474D4585.3406.000B.0@gcrta.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 Message-Id: <20071128172019.032FE954DF@smtp-03.servidoresdns.net> X-archive-position: 3542 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-to: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: j.miranda@sermatica.es Precedence: normal Reply-to: j.miranda@sermatica.es List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: oracle-l X-List-ID: oracle-l List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at localhost.localdomain ------=_NextPart_000_002D_01C831EB.64D42740 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =20 Hi =20 I use Itanium only with HP-UX on very big an critical clients.=20 Hardware: rx8640, rx6600. Very reliable and good performance (only dual = core Itanium). You can use also Linux and Windows but I think HP-UX will be better. =20 x86-64 system=B4s have very good performance. I use it in small to = medium database servers. Linux (I prefer) or Windows (If client wants it).=20 =20 I always use Windows 32bit by now, but this SO have a 2GB/per process limitation so we are thinking to change to Windows 64bit. (I need some references on working systems). =20 I use the SAP bechmark to compare server performance using Oracle. http://www.sap.com/solutions/benchmark/sd2tier.epx =20 You need to Download in tab-delimited text format, open with Excel and = using autofilter, sort by SAPS. =20 Another good bechmarks are www.tpc.org and www.spec.org=20 =20 greetings. _____ =20 De: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org] = En nombre de Jeffrey Beckstrom Enviado el: mi=E9rcoles, 28 de noviembre de 2007 16:40 Para: oracle-l-freelists; oracle-db-l; oracle tech-old list; oracle = rdbms group Asunto: x86-64 or itanium We are trying to decide between x86-64 bit and Itanium servers. =20 For those of you running 64-bit, which hardware and OS are you using. =20 Jeffrey Beckstrom Database Administrator Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority 1240 W. 6th Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 ------=_NextPart_000_002D_01C831EB.64D42740 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
Hi
 
I use = Itanium only with=20 HP-UX on very big an critical clients.
Hardware: = rx8640, rx6600.=20 Very reliable and good performance (only dual core = Itanium).
You can use = also Linux=20 and Windows but I think HP-UX will be better.
 
x86-64 = system=B4s have very=20 good performance. I use it in small to medium database = servers.
Linux (I = prefer) or=20 Windows (If client wants it).
 
I always = use Windows=20 32bit by now, but this SO have a 2GB/per process limitation so = we=20 are
thinking to = change to=20 Windows 64bit. (I need some references on working systems).
 
I use the = SAP bechmark to=20 compare server performance using Oracle.
http://www.sa= p.com/solutions/benchmark/sd2tier.epx
 
You need = to=20 Download in tab-delimited text format, open with Excel = and=20 using autofilter, sort by SAPS.
 
Another good bechmarks are www.tpc.org and www.spec.org
 
greetings.

De: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org = [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org]=20 En nombre de Jeffrey Beckstrom
Enviado el: mi=E9rcoles, = 28 de=20 noviembre de 2007 16:40
Para: oracle-l-freelists; oracle-db-l; = oracle=20 tech-old list; oracle rdbms group
Asunto: x86-64 or=20 itanium

We are trying to decide between x86-64 bit and Itanium = servers.
 
For those of you running 64-bit, which hardware and OS are you = using.
 
Jeffrey Beckstrom
Database Administrator
Greater Cleveland = Regional=20 Transit Authority
1240 W. 6th Street
Cleveland, Ohio=20 44113
------=_NextPart_000_002D_01C831EB.64D42740-- -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l