Return-Path: Delivered-To: 2-oracle-l@orafaq.com Received: (qmail 22156 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2007 10:32:19 -0500 Received: from freelists-180.iquest.net (HELO turing.freelists.org) (206.53.239.180) by 69.64.49.119 with SMTP; 28 Aug 2007 10:32:14 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 5185B7321DA; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 10:51:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13157-02; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 10:51:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id B3CCD732229; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 10:51:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Tue, 28 Aug 2007 10:07:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id DD35A73225A for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 10:07:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07812-06 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 10:07:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from email10.mywebmailserver.com (email10.mywebmailserver.com [199.231.136.140]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 83CFD732358 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 10:06:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 600d620tcoyle ([72.165.244.50]) by email10.mywebmailserver.com (IntelliMail) with ASMTP id CRY74585; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 10:42:04 -0400 From: "Ted Coyle" To: Cc: References: <400233.30734.qm@web60811.mail.yahoo.com> Subject: RE: Same old story: 32 bits ORACLE VS 64 bits performance Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 10:41:45 -0400 Message-ID: <003f01c7e981$8f4debd0$6401a8c0@medecision.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 In-Reply-To: <400233.30734.qm@web60811.mail.yahoo.com> X-archive-position: 1060 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-to: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: oracle-l@webthere.com Precedence: normal Reply-to: oracle-l@webthere.com List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: oracle-l X-List-ID: oracle-l List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at localhost.localdomain From a previous thread, I have 64 bit Oracle on AIX p5 and it is 4x slower than 32 bit Oracle on my laptop. Even so, I'd go with 64bit every time if possible. Simple Google search yielded this. http://www.puschitz.com/TuningLinuxForOracle.shtml#HardwareArchitecturesAndL inuxKernels Ted -----Original Message----- From: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of dba1 mcc Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 9:43 AM To: oracle-l@freelists.org Subject: Same old story: 32 bits ORACLE VS 64 bits performance We have several large ORACLE projects on progress. I wonder anyone have report or web site which compare performance on 32 BITs ORACLE (with 32 bits REDHAT AS) to 64 bits ORACLE ? Thanks. ____________________________________________________________________________ ________ Building a website is a piece of cake. Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the tools to get online. http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/webhosting -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l