MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: RAC or Not RAC
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:52:30 -0500
Message-ID: <DB508580748FAD4692628A58C4E653F5526764@MAIL01.Corp.FC.LOCAL>
Thread-Topic: RAC or Not RAC
From: "Oliver Jost" <Oliver.Jost@ca.fujitsu.com>
To: "oracle-l" <oracle-l@freelists.org>
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Content-Type: multipart/related; type="multipart/alternative";	boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C71E37.BA6EE0E6"
Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
Errors-to: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
Precedence: normal
Reply-to: Oliver.Jost@ca.fujitsu.com
------_=_NextPart_001_01C71E37.BA6EE0E6
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_002_01C71E37.BA6EE0E6"
------_=_NextPart_002_01C71E37.BA6EE0E6
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi All,
  I have a question that may be a touch backwards.  My option is to
create a standalone instance on 10G or single-node RAC 10G.  Aside from
support, does anyone have any pros and cons to potential approach.  If
we move to a standalone instance we can stablize our application and
upgrade to RAC.  If we go with RAC I can just add a node when it
presents itself.  I know the RAC pack suggests a standalone instance
rather than a single node RAC and I'm inclined that way myself.  Could
anyone add their insight/experience?=20

Thank you,=20
     Oliver=20


------_=_NextPart_002_01C71E37.BA6EE0E6
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE id=3DridTitle>Blank</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<STYLE>BODY {
	MARGIN-TOP: 25px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 25px; COLOR: #000000; =
FONT-FAMILY: Arial, Helvetica
}
P.msoNormal {
	MARGIN-TOP: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; COLOR: #ffffcc; =
FONT-FAMILY: Helvetica, "Times New Roman"
}
LI.msoNormal {
	MARGIN-TOP: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; COLOR: #ffffcc; =
FONT-FAMILY: Helvetica, "Times New Roman"
}
</STYLE>

<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2995" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=3DridBody background=3Dcid:844284621@12122006-383B>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D844284621-12122006>Hi All,</SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D844284621-12122006>&nbsp; I have a question that may =
be a touch=20
backwards.&nbsp; My option is to create a standalone instance on 10G or=20
single-node RAC 10G.&nbsp; Aside from support, does anyone have any pros =
and=20
cons to potential approach.&nbsp; If we move to a standalone instance we =
can=20
stablize our application and upgrade to RAC.&nbsp; If we go with RAC I =
can just=20
add a node when it presents itself.&nbsp; I know the RAC pack suggests a =

standalone instance rather than a single node RAC and I'm inclined that =
way=20
myself.&nbsp; Could anyone add their =
insight/experience?&nbsp;</SPAN></DIV><!-- Converted from text/rtf =
format -->
<P align=3Dleft><SPAN lang=3Den-us>Thank you,</SPAN> <BR><SPAN=20
lang=3Den-us>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Oliver =
</SPAN><BR></P></BODY></HTML>

------_=_NextPart_002_01C71E37.BA6EE0E6--

------_=_NextPart_001_01C71E37.BA6EE0E6
Content-Type: image/gif; name="Blank Bkgrd.gif"
Content-Description: Blank Bkgrd.gif
Content-ID: <844284621@12122006-383B>
Content-Location: Blank%20Bkgrd.gif
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64

R0lGODlhLQAtAID/AP////f39ywAAAAALQAtAEACcAxup8vtvxKQsFon6d02898pGkgiYoCm6sq2
7iqWcmzOsmeXeA7uPJd5CYdD2g9oPF58ygqz+XhCG9JpJGmlYrPXGlfr/Yo/VW45e7amp2tou/lW
xo/zX513z+Vt+1n/tiX2pxP4NUhy2FM4xtjIUQAAOw==


------_=_NextPart_001_01C71E37.BA6EE0E6--
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l