Return-Path: <oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org>
Delivered-To: 2-oracle-l@orafaq.com
Received: (qmail 9680 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2006 09:08:34 -0600
Received: from freelists-180.iquest.net (HELO turing.freelists.org) (206.53.239.180)
  by 69.64.49.119 with SMTP; 12 Dec 2006 09:08:29 -0600
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id D49E1566205;
 Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:05:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 06005-04; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:05:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 09D835661FC;
 Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:05:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:04:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 529D6565F97
 for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:04:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 05631-03 for <oracle-l@freelists.org>;
 Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:04:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.241])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 593A25657F9
 for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:04:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b8so354742ana
        for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:05:10 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=TQvDQlXajkS3sGzruW+7SfHNso4ilVNS5QqBPIiCg2n4VyLeWL5/uFwlqe/mfDO1dMb0mB5cGDZz2M4N6lBhZBL/TpqVm4e0bdWJdu2gNEIyavblnyfWTAAeB3U936SIlYlzlJI7M3qn7aiC7kc1zQILuTahTcNvyA5zX2XFw9g=
Received: by 10.78.166.7 with SMTP id o7mr2291950hue.1165935475464;
        Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:57:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.78.124.5 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:57:55 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <411d50f60612120657y383eb5b4nbb203c89c829e4bf@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:57:55 +0100
From: "Ghassan Salem" <salem.ghassan@gmail.com>
To: sacrophyte@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Anyone running 10gR2 EM/GC on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 AS
Cc: oracle-l <oracle-l@freelists.org>
In-Reply-To: <7b8774110612120647t4744148bkd3e83b3d01daaa1d@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_107881_14824523.1165935475093"
References: <7b8774110612050803q2f5d8f00iac45ad77fe00ab36@mail.gmail.com>
	 <7b8774110612120647t4744148bkd3e83b3d01daaa1d@mail.gmail.com>
X-archive-position: 43032
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
Errors-to: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
X-original-sender: salem.ghassan@gmail.com
Precedence: normal
Reply-to: salem.ghassan@gmail.com
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@freelists.org?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <oracle-l-request@freelists.org?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-Id: oracle-l <oracle-l.freelists.org>
X-List-ID: oracle-l <oracle-l.freelists.org>
List-subscribe: <oracle-l-request@freelists.org?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:steve.adams@ixora.com.au>
List-post: <mailto:oracle-l@freelists.org>
List-archive: <http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l>
X-list: oracle-l
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at avenirtech.net
------=_Part_107881_14824523.1165935475093
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Charles,
from what I could get, the issue is with the JVM, it seems that it does not
allow symbolic links when paths are used in a some types of classes (JNI
interfaces, it seems, but I'm not a Java guy, so cannot really verify or
explain much).

rgds

On 12/12/06, Charles Schultz <sacrophyte@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> As Ghassan Salem pointed out, and as many of you probably already know,
> Oracle Application Server is not supported on symbolic links. In the process
> of getting over my complete disbelief in this premise, I have to ask if
> anyone out there knows the technical reasons for this? My linux sysadmin has
> these questions that I would love to know the answers to myself:
>
> Which kernel operation are they saying can distinguish between a symlink &
> a directory?
> Will we be able to revert this change once we're done?
> Will the other machines that have /u01 need the same change?
> What command are you running that fails?
> What is the command doing that would succeed without a symlink?
>
>
> On 12/5/06, Charles Schultz < sacrophyte@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > We are hitting an install problem, and the documented perquisites are so
> > far off it really makes me wonder about this whole quasi-Red Hat support. We
> > filed a case with Oracle Support, but they are giving us the run-around.
> > Next up, Duty Manager.
> >
>
>
> --
> Charles Schultz

------=_Part_107881_14824523.1165935475093
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Charles,<br>from what I could get, the issue is with the JVM, it seems that it does not allow symbolic links when paths are used in a some types of classes (JNI interfaces, it seems, but I'm not a Java guy, so cannot really verify or explain much).
<br><br>rgds<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 12/12/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Charles Schultz</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:sacrophyte@gmail.com">sacrophyte@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
As Ghassan Salem pointed out, and as many of you probably already know, Oracle Application Server is not supported on symbolic links. In the process of getting over my complete disbelief in this premise, I have to ask if anyone out there knows the technical reasons for this? My linux sysadmin has these questions that I would love to know the answers to myself:
<br><br>Which kernel operation are they saying can distinguish between a symlink &amp; a directory?<br>Will we be able to revert this change once we're done?<br>Will the other machines that have /u01 need the same change?
<br>What command are you running that fails?<br>What is the command doing that would succeed without a symlink?<br><br><br><div><span class="q"><span class="gmail_quote">On 12/5/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Charles Schultz
</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:sacrophyte@gmail.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
sacrophyte@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:</span></span><span class="q"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">We are hitting an install problem, and the documented perquisites are so far off it really makes me wonder about this whole quasi-Red Hat support. We filed a case with Oracle Support, but they are giving us the run-around. Next up, Duty Manager.
<br></blockquote></span></div><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><span class="sg">Charles Schultz

</span></blockquote></div><br>

------=_Part_107881_14824523.1165935475093--
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


