DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=GCL7N7G2bEFiXdW2CoyGRjW9LM89qAGPkojyfk29zpilQ7OkqIgXtuOkakKqf6GU1kn9KbKfVLDPubHAwMyPBUMMuue9WveSOOd1cu4w+jAC1yv26t7gCXFjdxUEKeFVuFxooiEGDCXmxTwSsfq5poV+dKmYV+a9S81MkvDmGdg=
Message-ID: <7b8774110612120647t4744148bkd3e83b3d01daaa1d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:47:14 -0600
From: "Charles Schultz" <sacrophyte@gmail.com>
To: oracle-l <oracle-l@freelists.org>
Subject: Re: Anyone running 10gR2 EM/GC on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 AS
In-Reply-To: <7b8774110612050803q2f5d8f00iac45ad77fe00ab36@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_86970_17175788.1165934834260"
References: <7b8774110612050803q2f5d8f00iac45ad77fe00ab36@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
Errors-to: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
Precedence: normal
Reply-to: sacrophyte@gmail.com
------=_Part_86970_17175788.1165934834260
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

As Ghassan Salem pointed out, and as many of you probably already know,
Oracle Application Server is not supported on symbolic links. In the process
of getting over my complete disbelief in this premise, I have to ask if
anyone out there knows the technical reasons for this? My linux sysadmin has
these questions that I would love to know the answers to myself:

Which kernel operation are they saying can distinguish between a symlink & a
directory?
Will we be able to revert this change once we're done?
Will the other machines that have /u01 need the same change?
What command are you running that fails?
What is the command doing that would succeed without a symlink?


On 12/5/06, Charles Schultz <sacrophyte@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> We are hitting an install problem, and the documented perquisites are so
> far off it really makes me wonder about this whole quasi-Red Hat support. We
> filed a case with Oracle Support, but they are giving us the run-around.
> Next up, Duty Manager.
>


-- 
Charles Schultz

------=_Part_86970_17175788.1165934834260
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

As Ghassan Salem pointed out, and as many of you probably already know, Oracle Application Server is not supported on symbolic links. In the process of getting over my complete disbelief in this premise, I have to ask if anyone out there knows the technical reasons for this? My linux sysadmin has these questions that I would love to know the answers to myself:
<br><br>Which kernel operation are they saying can distinguish between a symlink &amp; a directory?<br>Will we be able to revert this change once we're done?<br>Will the other machines that have /u01 need the same change?
<br>What command are you running that fails?<br>What is the command doing that would succeed without a symlink?<br><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 12/5/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Charles Schultz</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:sacrophyte@gmail.com">
sacrophyte@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">We are hitting an install problem, and the documented perquisites are so far off it really makes me wonder about this whole quasi-Red Hat support. We filed a case with Oracle Support, but they are giving us the run-around. Next up, Duty Manager.
<br></blockquote></div><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Charles Schultz

------=_Part_86970_17175788.1165934834260--
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l