Return-Path: Delivered-To: 2-oracle-l@orafaq.com Received: (qmail 1956 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2006 15:03:16 -0500 Received: from freelists-180.iquest.net (HELO turing.freelists.org) (206.53.239.180) by 69.64.49.119 with SMTP; 7 Jul 2006 15:03:16 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id E3BD2393EE1; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:03:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18148-07-2; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:03:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 28F463940DC; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:03:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Fri, 07 Jul 2006 16:02:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 32F3539403A for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:02:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18014-04 for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:02:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.187]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id B8131394052 for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:02:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so10976nfc for ; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 13:02:23 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=DG2LMEcPswId2IBraSPvrIHIAfkxMIGHKhJNQ6/YFmn+C23sn08DTZg4OJeBZzZ2O0qiTg2InatlSmPvJeCLrphEP2JAjOXfafIOMABK17sx2IFDQiS9+/w0VPg8OgC9gh55nQRIVfBFylG1L4rEat/VY26Gi6f1h1X74IoZRYg= Received: by 10.49.55.5 with SMTP id h5mr1686193nfk; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 13:02:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.206.2 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 13:02:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <83a585ac0607071302j20b3a384we67826ffb902bee8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:02:22 -0500 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alfonso_Le=F3n?=" To: "Alex Gorbachev" Subject: Re: Get rid of trace files with undo notification Cc: cichomitiko@gmail.com, oracle-l In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2270_32059425.1152302542701" References: <83a585ac0607051203v4b1c5f78ob77cf085fb61264@mail.gmail.com> <01f401c6a073$b73ed7b0$d900a8c0@ETNOTEAM6XUQ9V> X-archive-position: 36843 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-to: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: aleon68@gmail.com Precedence: normal Reply-to: aleon68@gmail.com X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at avenirtech.net ------=_Part_2270_32059425.1152302542701 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Thanks for your answers. Alex and Dimitre. But we would not like to disable the offlining of the undo segment, we would like just not to generate the traces or instead send the onlined undo notification to the alert log. Any ideas on it? Thanks again. On 7/5/06, Alex Gorbachev wrote: > > Right. Oracle support has also suggested that we enable offlining from > time to time disabling it completely might cause some side effects so > be careful. > > 2006/7/5, Radoulov, Dimitre : > > > we are getting a lot of traces files with the following information, > does > > > anybody know why this traces appear and how to supress them? > > > > I remember there was a bug (and possible instance hang) that I suppose > has > > already been fixed (9.2.0.7/10g?), but you could get rid of the > continuous > > undo offlining/onliing with event 10511, level 2. > > -- > Best regards, > Alex Gorbachev > > http://blog.oracloid.com > -- Alfonso Leon ------=_Part_2270_32059425.1152302542701 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Thanks for your answers. Alex and Dimitre.

But we would not like to disable the offlining of the undo segment, we would like just not to generate the traces or instead send the onlined undo notification to the alert log. Any ideas on it?

Thanks again.



On 7/5/06, Alex Gorbachev <gorbyx@gmail.com> wrote:
Right. Oracle support has also suggested that we enable offlining from
time to time disabling it completely might cause some side effects so
be careful.

2006/7/5, Radoulov, Dimitre < cichomitiko@gmail.com>:
> > we are getting a lot of traces files with the following information, does
> > anybody know why this traces appear and how to supress them?
>
> I remember there was a bug (and possible instance hang) that I suppose has
> already been fixed (9.2.0.7/10g?), but you could get rid of the continuous
> undo offlining/onliing with event 10511, level 2.

--
Best regards,
Alex Gorbachev

http://blog.oracloid.com



--
Alfonso Leon ------=_Part_2270_32059425.1152302542701-- -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l