Return-Path: Delivered-To: 2-oracle-l@orafaq.com Received: (qmail 10316 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2006 11:40:03 -0600 Received: from freelists-180.iquest.net (HELO turing.freelists.org) (206.53.239.180) by 69.64.49.119 with SMTP; 2 Feb 2006 11:40:03 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 655AA2908B1; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 12:40:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09860-07; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 12:40:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id E32E72910E9; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 12:40:02 -0500 (EST) Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Thu, 02 Feb 2006 12:39:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id D9F73290DF5 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 12:39:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09822-07 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 12:39:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from uproxy.gmail.com (uproxy.gmail.com [66.249.92.203]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id AC3BB28BDCB for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 12:39:46 -0500 (EST) Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id c2so291665ugf for ; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 09:39:43 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Yd3iSSGcw12InC1mZq5QKFcUpBh3GWYU7QM8cgZYgAQ3t4RT1nd+9rt6IcZfL2BTOTnujyqirN5SAjzBobx/oJAUK0cLGBkXbspmGzrhp65ex09TEZNm4WKOiIHL7PN2v7O+2h237MPMiil9xWuv2Qyveo5e4dVTjuC0SCzP72Y= Received: by 10.49.34.18 with SMTP id m18mr216467nfj; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 09:39:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.42.18 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 09:39:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 17:39:43 +0000 From: Jurijs Velikanovs To: oracle-l@freelists.org Subject: Re: Disable logging in tablespace vs using hidden parameter _disable_logging In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: X-archive-position: 30709 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: j.velikanovs@gmail.com Precedence: normal Reply-To: j.velikanovs@gmail.com X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net :)))))))))))))))))))))))))))) Oracle Certified Profesional 9i 10g Orace Certified Professional Developer 6i 8 years of experience in Oracle 7,8i,9i,10g and developer 6i :)))))))))))))))))))))))))))) On 2/2/06, Juan Carlos Reyes Pacheco wrote: > Hi I was asking my self, and I decided to ask people who knows better about it: > > Which is the difference if I set all tablespace to nologging vs > if I set the hidden parameter to disable logging _disable_logging. > To get an import to development environment faster. > > I know I can't recover if there is a problem, etc, etc. The question > is which is the real difference. > > .) Thank you > -- > Oracle Certified Profesional 9i 10g > Orace Certified Professional Developer 6i > > 8 years of experience in Oracle 7,8i,9i,10g and developer 6i > -- > http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l > > > -- Jurijs +44 7738 013090 (GMT) ============================================ http://otn.oracle.com/ocm/jvelikanovs.html -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l