Return-Path: <oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org>
Delivered-To: 2-oracle-l@orafaq.com
Received: (qmail 10459 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2006 11:41:06 -0600
Received: from freelists-180.iquest.net (HELO turing.freelists.org) (206.53.239.180)
  by 69.64.49.119 with SMTP; 2 Feb 2006 11:41:06 -0600
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id CCE272914D3;
 Thu,  2 Feb 2006 12:41:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 10081-01; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 12:41:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 3C4A029129E;
 Thu,  2 Feb 2006 12:41:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Thu, 02 Feb 2006 12:40:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 8B0D529133F
 for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Thu,  2 Feb 2006 12:40:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 10002-06 for <oracle-l@freelists.org>;
 Thu, 2 Feb 2006 12:40:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: from uproxy.gmail.com (uproxy.gmail.com [66.249.92.203])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 28859291373
 for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Thu,  2 Feb 2006 12:40:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id c2so292177ugf
        for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 09:40:44 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=ZfsaHd5ccExtyswzGMy8cDfr6EipHPsCIqTocu34uVrWkN62nZYCgtXuthv1W47t88B6H0BlTqNSIcBlV6oLLBdUfb9VhBSCtrt5CtM/dd9kMtD0WeulhcaWyjYfoVYkLXkKy+tsjRiTfrWZw6EwjoGJYlJKpmzw1T2ZzqrMfX0=
Received: by 10.66.252.11 with SMTP id z11mr180228ugh;
        Thu, 02 Feb 2006 09:34:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.67.27.20 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 09:34:35 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <6e9345580602020934i19551094x68b79595d5deac54@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 18:34:35 +0100
From: Li-Shan Cheng <exriscer@gmail.com>
To: juancarlosreyesp@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Disable logging in tablespace vs using hidden parameter _disable_logging
Cc: oracle-l@freelists.org
In-Reply-To: <cd4305c10602020927s49be7a3ue231fee12307e332@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_5448_28646580.1138901675748"
References: <cd4305c10602020927s49be7a3ue231fee12307e332@mail.gmail.com>
X-archive-position: 30710
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
X-original-sender: exriscer@gmail.com
Precedence: normal
Reply-To: exriscer@gmail.com
X-list: oracle-l
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net
------=_Part_5448_28646580.1138901675748
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Well they are not the samething to start with.


NOLOGGING only works for direct load operations, index rebuilds etc (there
are more)


_disable_logging means no redo whatsoever




On 2/2/06, Juan Carlos Reyes Pacheco <juancarlosreyesp@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi I was asking my self, and I decided to ask people who knows better
> about it:
>
> Which is the difference if I set all tablespace to nologging    vs
> if I set the hidden parameter to disable logging  _disable_logging.
> To get an import to development environment faster.
>
> I know I can't recover if there is a problem, etc, etc. The question
> is which is the real difference.
>
> .)  Thank you
> --
> Oracle Certified Profesional 9i 10g
> Orace Certified Professional Developer 6i
>
> 8 years of experience in Oracle 7,8i,9i,10g and developer 6i
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>

------=_Part_5448_28646580.1138901675748
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Well they are not the samething to start with. <br><br><br>NOLOGGING only w=
orks for direct load operations, index rebuilds etc (there are more)<br><br=
><br>_disable_logging means no redo whatsoever<br><br><br><br><br><div><spa=
n class=3D"gmail_quote">
On 2/2/06, <b class=3D"gmail_sendername">Juan Carlos Reyes Pacheco</b> &lt;=
<a href=3D"mailto:juancarlosreyesp@gmail.com">juancarlosreyesp@gmail.com</a=
>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: =
1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;=
">
Hi I was asking my self, and I decided to ask people who knows better about=
 it:<br><br>Which is the difference if I set all tablespace to nologging&nb=
sp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;vs<br>if I set the hidden parameter to disable logging=
&nbsp;&nbsp;_disable_logging.
<br>To get an import to development environment faster.<br><br>I know I can=
't recover if there is a problem, etc, etc. The question<br>is which is the=
 real difference.<br><br>.)&nbsp;&nbsp;Thank you<br>--<br>Oracle Certified =
Profesional 9i 10g
<br>Orace Certified Professional Developer 6i<br><br>8 years of experience =
in Oracle 7,8i,9i,10g and developer 6i<br>--<br><a href=3D"http://www.freel=
ists.org/webpage/oracle-l">http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l</a><br=
>
<br><br></blockquote></div><br>

------=_Part_5448_28646580.1138901675748--
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


