Return-Path: Delivered-To: 2-oracle-l@orafaq.com Received: (qmail 6484 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2006 01:46:44 -0600 Received: from freelists-180.iquest.net (HELO turing.freelists.org) (206.53.239.180) by 69.64.49.119 with SMTP; 2 Feb 2006 01:46:44 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id C8561290B29; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 02:46:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16649-03; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 02:46:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 4CFAB290A9A; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 02:46:43 -0500 (EST) Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Thu, 02 Feb 2006 02:46:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 475DD290A9D for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 02:46:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16503-08 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 02:46:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from breemxgw3s01.ras (relay1.rasnet.it [213.156.34.249]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id DECA2290A9A for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 02:46:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from breemxmr3s02.rasgroup.ita.localnet ([192.168.25.159]) by breemxgw3s01.ras with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 2 Feb 2006 08:46:26 +0100 Received: from MAILEX01.rasgroup.ita.localnet ([192.168.25.101]) by breemxmr3s02.rasgroup.ita.localnet with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Thu, 2 Feb 2006 08:46:25 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Subject: RE: 10.2 NFS mount points Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 08:46:25 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: 10.2 NFS mount points thread-index: AcYnhHL7zwNqEmwdSWyd6j2Cbe9c5QABfBjwABCRdRAFrom: "Magni Fabrizio" To: , "oracle-l" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Feb 2006 07:46:25.0916 (UTC) FILETIME=[C50923C0:01C627CC] X-archive-position: 30692 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: Fabrizio.Magni@rasnet.it Precedence: normal Reply-To: Fabrizio.Magni@rasnet.it X-list: oracle-l From: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net Count me as a reader. Just to ask (if possible) what have you used for your stress tests/benchmarks? Regards Fabrizio > -----Original Message----- > From: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org > [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Closson > Sent: 02 February, 2006 12:56 AM > To: oracle-l > Subject: RE: 10.2 NFS mount points > > >>> > >>>I believe that I will not be the only one who would really like to > >>>read the paper when it becomes available. May I bribe you with a > >>>virtual beer to let me know when it becomes available? > > Yeah sure. But, heck, I might be way off base on what might > be interesting to folks . Does anyone consider ~3200 4K > transfers per second (60% write) per CPU with 8ms avg latency > to NAS worth considering ? Or 208 MB/s per RAC node > throughput with direct path writes ? To a single NFS filesystem ? > > :-) > > > -- > http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l > > > -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l