From oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Mon Nov 21 18:16:36 2005 Return-Path: Received: from air891.startdedicated.com (root@localhost) by orafaq.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jAM0GZ5k003916 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:16:35 -0600 X-ClientAddr: 206.53.239.180 Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180]) by air891.startdedicated.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jAM0GUAX003901 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:16:31 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id BE77B2330D6; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 19:16:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08545-02; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 19:16:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 41402233131; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 19:16:27 -0500 (EST) Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Mon, 21 Nov 2005 19:14:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id DD5D32330C3 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 19:14:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08173-04 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 19:14:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from ectil-mr.ectel.com (mail-is.ectel.com [212.199.70.210]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 34D37232F95 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 19:14:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from ectilex.ectel.com ([172.16.0.21]) by ectil-mr.ectel.com with InterScan Messaging Security Suite; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 02:14:45 +0200 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C5EEFA.093745A6" Subject: BLOCK CHANGE TRACKING and direct loading Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 02:13:40 +0200 Message-ID: <5A841A20A9085A4C984EADD0FF97BF3707FEBD@ectilex.ectel.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: BLOCK CHANGE TRACKING and direct loading thread-index: AcXu+ZX18CGXIfJNRSmkbqHWHeqZ6g== From: "Amihay Gonen" To: X-archive-position: 28564 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: AmihayG@ectel.com Precedence: normal Reply-To: AmihayG@ectel.com X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net X-mailscan-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-mailscan-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on air891.startdedicated.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=ham version=2.63 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5EEFA.093745A6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi , I'm considerting using BLOCK CHANGE TRACKING feature in rman to = reduce backup time and overhead. =20 I wander if anyone has experience with the feature. =20 1. does direct logging is logged in BLOCK CHANGE TRACK ? 2. does drop partition operation , clear the block change tracking file = ? 3. What is the overhead of using such feature ? ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5EEFA.093745A6 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi , I'm considerting using BLOCK CHANGE = TRACKING feature =0A= in rman to reduce backup time and overhead.
=0A=
 
=0A=
I wander if anyone has experience with = the =0A= feature.
=0A=
 
=0A=
1. does direct logging is logged in = BLOCK CHANGE =0A= TRACK ?
=0A=
2. does drop partition operation , = clear the block =0A= change tracking file ?
=0A=
3. What is the overhead of using such = feature =0A= ?
------_=_NextPart_001_01C5EEFA.093745A6-- -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l