From oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Thu Oct 20 14:24:45 2005 Return-Path: Received: from air891.startdedicated.com (root@localhost) by orafaq.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j9KJOeJw023677 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 14:24:40 -0500 X-ClientAddr: 206.53.239.180 Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180]) by air891.startdedicated.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j9KJOZvX023662 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 14:24:35 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 6348E209254; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 14:24:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21198-04; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 14:24:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id DE8B4209360; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 14:24:27 -0500 (EST) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Subject: Off topic: RE: Questions about automatic memory allocations in 10g (r1 and r2) Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 12:22:27 -0700 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Off topic: RE: Questions about automatic memory allocations in 10g (r1 and r2) Thread-Index: AcXVqxR3KKaow5cvSHeDKWEqr1fZRQAAKSSw From: "Kevin Closson" To: "Oracle-L" X-archive-position: 27287 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: kevinc@polyserve.com Precedence: normal Reply-To: kevinc@polyserve.com X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net X-mailscan-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-mailscan-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on air891.startdedicated.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 At least the Foster's we get in the U.S. was at one time made in Australia. Didn't taste too bad, and you had to love the size of the can. Now we get Canadian-made Foster's. "Australian for beer, eh?" Contract brewing has been the plague of Japanese beer too. The last holdout was Kirin Ichiban, but it too has gone the way of contract brewing. American's, by and large, don't care. Pils anyone ? -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l