| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
 |
 | |||
| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
|
| |||
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Managing developers recommendations
Regarding the versions, are you referring to "Toad for Oracle" and "Toad for
Oracle Professional"?
In the version I tested there are lists of all schemas in the database, and their associated objects. How would this look if the developer does not have the required priviledges? (Would they receive an error that they can't select from dba_objects? etc.?)
Thanks for the input!
>From: "Goulet, Dick" <DGoulet_at_vicr.com>
>To: <fred_fred_1_at_hotmail.com>,<oracle-l_at_freelists.org>
>Subject: RE: Managing developers recommendations
>Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:39:02 -0400
>
>Fred,
>
> Your developers don't need the DBA version of TOAD. What they
>need is the basic TOAD. And besides even if they do have the DBA
>version, without the necessary database level permissions they can't do
>anything destructive.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
>[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Fred Smith
>Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 4:30 PM
>To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
>Subject: Managing developers recommendations
>
>Hi all,
> My developers (who currently just use SQL Plus) now are wanting to use
>
>Quest TOAD. From what I've used it in the past, it is far too powerful
>for
>developers. (I don't trust my developers with creating tablespaces,
>etc.).
>Plus, I've found that TOAD is far too easy to delete objects, etc.
> Any recommendations, etc would greatly be appreciated!
>-Fred S.
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's
>FREE!
>http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
>
>--
>http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Wed Oct 12 2005 - 15:46:57 CDT
 |
 |