From oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Thu Jul 7 08:31:06 2005 Return-Path: Received: from air891.startdedicated.com (root@localhost) by orafaq.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j67DV626026485 for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 08:31:06 -0500 X-ClientAddr: 206.53.239.180 Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180]) by air891.startdedicated.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j67DV1IP026464 for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 08:31:01 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id D0E791C9269; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 08:30:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04886-08; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 08:30:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 58F301C8FFA; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 08:30:54 -0500 (EST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=sne05Cpfnr43DOaME4mBYBbsL1NZBTSOl1NRmvRJX2OEEkQCV5KFyr7dEajONmr+T1J3qkk2vSDnv4HuV0AOlBL/C4uzdobHfdqpWLyFL+8aeIEeBH3vkWn9BWGMDWgm1kggHvVYychPpRp00Knyn2bY+G7AzgxxWTgmbqD/Nho= Message-ID: Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 09:29:06 -0400 From: Sandeep Dubey To: "Mercadante, Thomas F (LABOR)" Subject: Re: VPD vs multiple schems vs multiple instance Cc: oracledba.williams@gmail.com, oracle-l@freelists.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: X-archive-position: 22165 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: dubey.sandeep@gmail.com Precedence: normal Reply-To: dubey.sandeep@gmail.com X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net X-mailscan-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-mailscan-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on air891.startdedicated.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 Thanks for the input. I am trying to rule out using VPD. Even with smaller data say 100 GB each for 4 clients sharing a common schema, I am expecting performance degradation. Am I correct in my assertion? What could be other downside of using VPD? Thanks Sandeep -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l