Re: Unindexed FK Cause Deadlock or Only Share Lock?

If you attempt to delete a parent row,
or update the key value of a parent
row in a parent/child relationship where the child DOES NOT HAVE an index
on the foreign key, then Oracle will
attempt to acquire a mode 4 lock
on the child table (or mode 5 if it
has previously modified the child
table).

If any other sessions are currently
modifying the child table, your session
will have to wait before it can acquire
its mode 4/5 as the other sessions will
be holding mode 3 and therefore will
be blocking you.

Anyone who tries to start a new transaction on the child table (and therefore need to acquire a mode 3) will be blocked behind your request for a mode 4.

To engineer a deadlock:

    session A

        delete child row C1
        acquires mode 3 on child table

    session B
        delete child row C2
        acquires mode 3 on child table

    session A
        attempts to delete parent of C1
        attempts to convert mode 3 to mode 5
        blocked by session B holding mode 3
            therefore starts to wait

    session B
        attempts to delete parent of C2
        attempts to convert mode 3 to mode 5
        blocked by session A in the converters queue
            (viz: holding 3, and waiting to convert to 5)
            therefore start to wait

    Three seconds or less later, session a gets     an ORA-00060 Deadlock detected.

Regards

Jonathan Lewis

http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ

http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/appearances.html Public Appearances - schedule updated June 22nd 2005

• Original Message ----- From: "Post, Ethan" <Ethan.Post_at_ps.net> To: "Oracle-L_at_Freelists. Org (E-mail)" <oracle-l_at_freelists.org> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 7:32 PM Subject: Unindexed FK Cause Deadlock or Only Share Lock?

I am trying to find out if a missing index on a foreign key would cause a deadlock. I always thought is would only cause a share lock and hold up other DML, not deadlock it.

This asktom link http://tinyurl.com/djgco (search for deadlock and read comments/responses) seems to suggest you only get a share lock.

However I was sent these links also...some don't seem to support the idea of deadlocks but others do. Anyone know the answer here? Anyone think of a quick test case which demonstrates this?

--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Received on Thu Jun 30 2005 - 16:27:00 CDT