From oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Mon Jun 6 14:36:56 2005 Return-Path: Received: from air891.startdedicated.com (root@localhost) by orafaq.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j56JatG7008400 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:36:55 -0500 X-ClientAddr: 206.53.239.180 Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180]) by air891.startdedicated.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j56JanNi008390 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:36:54 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 7A3F31BBE1A; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:31:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03863-03; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:31:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id CFFB91BC0B3; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:31:33 -0500 (EST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=cVCVQq3cidWMpHvk6IzWrgf2k+zMGqOH+zAOoqxclFgWNz4hR+2z9gQj2k/GD88Gj0rF5Imvs8IMsCy+rClVwLD4iIdZnNczjTL8QcRVXkXbAeSS2avpTPmZMel9Kl3AYqoTntHbafHlVsiu414Rvc6Xz526os9XgWpFLXegXkk= Message-ID: <9177895d050606112811632633@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:28:57 -0400 From: rjamya To: "Marquez, Chris" Subject: Re: Oracle RAC cost justification? Cc: Tapan Trivedi , Oracle Discussion List In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain References: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 20709 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: rjamya@gmail.com Precedence: normal Reply-To: rjamya@gmail.com X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on air891.startdedicated.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=ham version=2.63 sqlnet mostly. Raj On 6/6/05, Marquez, Chris wrote: > > Raj, > > >>so the way implemented TAF, it is seamless for us > What is the client app; > SQL*Net > ODBC > JDBC (Think/OCI)? > > ------------------------------ select standard_disclaimer from company_requirements where category = 'MANDATORY'; -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l