Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: LOCALLY MANAGED EXTENT PERFORMANCE

Re: LOCALLY MANAGED EXTENT PERFORMANCE

From: Arul Ramachandran <contactarul_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 14:50:39 -0700
Message-ID: <1c1a62990504231450613c9190@mail.gmail.com>


Hi Ibrahim,

I also dumped LMT/Uniform allocation, and moved to LMT/Autoallocate.

On that 27G table, what is the largest size of an extent? I don't think it goes beyond 64M ( I am fine with that :). What is the version of Oracle?

Thanks,
Arul

On 4/22/05, Dogan, Ibrahim - Ibrahim <Ibrahim.Dogan_at_lowes.com> wrote:
>=20
> Even with LMTs, you still wory about number of extents whenever you run
> any command that performs extent allocation/deallocation (create
> table/rebuild index/truncate table etc..)
>=20
> My point was that I saw many people going back to DMT because of very
> same issue you're experiencing with LMTs.. When LMT with uniform extent
> size is used, you need to babysit the segments to make sure they don't
> go beyong couple thousand extents.. But you don't have this problem if
> you use LMT with AUTO extent allocation. My biggest table is 27G in a
> AUTO LMT and it has around 600 extents..
>=20
> I generally prefer AUTO LMT and reorg the tables after bulk deletes...=3D=
20
>=20
> Thanks,
> =3D20
> Ibrahim DOGAN
> Sr. Sybase/Oracle DBA
> www.lowes.com
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Sat Apr 23 2005 - 17:54:51 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US