Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: rm RULE based optimizer != GOOD IDEA
Of course, they're getting rid of LONG's also. ;-)
Someone else mentioned the i_o_c_a as a potential plan changer. Try to alte=
r=20
a session with a lower value for i_o_c_a and explain/autotrace the
query again. I have seen some of our queries "magically" change from
fts to irs.
On 4/22/05, Post, Ethan <Ethan.Post_at_ps.net> wrote:
> My prediction is that RULE hint will really go away as soon as apps no
> longer uses it anywhere. I have heard the same thing about its use.
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
> [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Marquez, Chris
> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 9:27 AM
> To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> Subject: RE: rm RULE based optimizer !=3D3D GOOD IDEA
>=20
> I have not supported Oracle Apps, but from what I understand it is
> loaded with hints and I believe some of the using "RULE hint.
> Seems a little "Do as I say not as I do" from Oracle Corp....eh?
>=20
> I agree about the spending all day on with stats and explain plans.
> I have a script to look for blocking locks using v$ views...it ran ok,
> but a DBA friend made if faster in about 5 minutes by adding a RULE
> hint.
> Maybe I should be going after the base Oracle tables, but I don't have
> all day.
>=20
> Finally about execution plans and speed changing of sql using the RBO.
> If I'm not mistaken many environment changes can effect CBO too!?
>=20
> Chris Marquez
> Oracle DBA
> HEYMONitor(tm) - heymonitor.com
> "Oracle Monitoring & Alerting Solution"
>=20
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Fri Apr 22 2005 - 12:07:15 CDT