Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: 10g & partitioning

Re: 10g & partitioning

From: mhthomas <qnxodba_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 12:06:15 -0400
Message-ID: <d6bad080050409090694b1d95@mail.gmail.com>


in-line

On Apr 8, 2005 11:27 PM, Wolfgang Breitling <breitliw_at_centrexcc.com> wrote:
> I DO think so, so does apparently Oracle:
>
> From http://www.oracle.com/database/db_options.html
>
> Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Options
>
> Oracle offers a selection of options to enhance the power of Oracle
> Database and meet your specific needs. Advanced options are available at
> additional cost.
>

  1. This is interesting. No doubt the confusion comes from this document, as well:

http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/database/oracle10g/pdf/twp_general_10gdb_product_family_0104.pdf

If we look at the difference between RAC and Partitioning options in the above document it is not clear, actually quite misleading for any non-DBA.Oracle compares SE and EE and for RAC mentions its an extra cost option for EE, but not for SE. Obviously RAC is free for SE, which is the expanation. But, on partitioning it states only 'N' under SE and 'Y' under EE. If you were unfamiliar with SE options, and compared only these two options, you probably conclude the same thing as Leyi. My managers might, too.

2) However, it is quite clear here (partitioning is extra cost on EE):

http://www.oracle.com/corporate/pricing/eplext.pdf

The pricelist might be a better reference when trying to convince your managers. ;-)

HTH Mike Thomas

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Sat Apr 09 2005 - 12:10:10 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US