From oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Wed Apr 6 10:49:37 2005 Return-Path: Received: from air891.startdedicated.com (root@localhost) by orafaq.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j36FnbbX025355 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:49:37 -0500 X-ClientAddr: 206.53.239.180 Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180]) by air891.startdedicated.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j36Fnbem025351 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:49:37 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 95A80920F9; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 09:47:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24505-02; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 09:47:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 18DD2920CF; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 09:47:33 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4253F615.9070205@pacbell.net> Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 07:45:41 -0700 From: Mark Bole User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "oracle-l@freelists.org" Subject: Re: UNIX question References: <97b7fd2f0504060657465f0dc8@mail.gmail.com> <16173.145.61.28.21.1112797127.squirrel@145.61.28.21> In-Reply-To: <16173.145.61.28.21.1112797127.squirrel@145.61.28.21> Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 18124 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: makbo@pacbell.net Precedence: normal Reply-To: makbo@pacbell.net X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on air891.startdedicated.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=ham version=2.60 X-Spam-Level: However "find" does support basic and/or/not logic, so: find dir \! -newer .... would be equivalent to the non-existent -older option. (Note escaped bang since it is a shell metacharacter). -Mark Bole http://www.bincomputing.com Carel-Jan Engel wrote: [...] > > alas find has no -older function, and the -atime option works with a > 'day'-unit. > > Regards, Carel-Jan [...] > >>Hello list, >> >>Can any one give me an example, how can I delete log files <2hrs to my >>system time. >> [...] -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l