Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Oracle on EMC Clarion CX500

Re: Oracle on EMC Clarion CX500

From: Paul Drake <bdbafh_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 16:19:49 -0400
Message-ID: <910046b405040513196f3ae13f@mail.gmail.com>


Wolfgang,

Sorry, that was just my bias.
After getting through the 8.1.7 to 9.2 migrations, I didn't want to alter the environment until the 9.2 to 10.1 migrations.

that's when I started gathering system statistics.

Paul



"Footnote 2: 5th April 2005

References to penguins in the above article should not be interpreted as being related in any way to Linux."


On Apr 5, 2005 4:10 PM, Wolfgang Breitling <breitliw_at_centrexcc.com> wrote:
> Paul,
>
> why only after migrating to 10g? The CBO in Oracle 9i with system stats
> ought to do the same - derive the cost of a full scan from the MBRC
> system stats value rather than from the dfmrc init parameter - or do you
> have evidence to the contrary?
>
> Paul Drake wrote:
>
> >
> > After you migrate to 10g (and gather system stats), you may be able to
> > get away with a larger db_file_multiblock_read_count (without the CBO
> > wanting to tablescan/hash_join everything) in which case a larger
> > stripe size will be better.
> >
> --
> Regards
>
> Wolfgang Breitling
> Centrex Consulting Corporation
> www.centrexcc.com
>

-- 
#/etc/init.d/init.cssd stop
# f=ma, divide by 1, convert to moles.
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Tue Apr 05 2005 - 16:23:40 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US