From oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Mon Apr 4 11:07:13 2005 Return-Path: Received: from air891.startdedicated.com (root@localhost) by orafaq.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j34G7D66030231 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:07:13 -0500 X-ClientAddr: 206.53.239.180 Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180]) by air891.startdedicated.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j34G7Cem030226 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:07:12 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 83F5D90381; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:05:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29172-03; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:05:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 0C5CA9036C; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:05:11 -0500 (EST) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: RE: Patchset 10.1.0.4 Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:04:20 -0500 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Patchset 10.1.0.4 thread-index: AcU2+M3GhWQbJhWmT7mvAOSJUODe1wCLgHNg From: "Jesse, Rich" To: "Oracle Discussion List" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Apr 2005 15:03:47.0702 (UTC) FILETIME=[80C7E960:01C53927] X-archive-position: 18001 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: Rich.Jesse@quadtechworld.com Precedence: normal Reply-To: Rich.Jesse@quadtechworld.com X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on air891.startdedicated.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham version=2.60 X-Spam-Level: That depends on your rendition of "bug free". If you're using the INSO = filter part of Oracle Text, it's been replaced with a "newer, better" = filter in ought-4. Nothing like changing an entire process on a = freaking bugfix patch. Shouldn't something that major have been = included with a major release instead, or am I completely mistaken as to = the meaning of the significant digits in an Oracle software version = number? Looks like I'll be going live with 10.1.0.3. Looking forward to the = book I'll be writing when asked why I'm not running the current patch on = my next TAR... Rich Rich Jesse System/Database Administrator rich.jesse@quadtechworld.com QuadTech, Sussex, WI USA -----Original Message----- From: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org]On Behalf Of Mladen Gogala Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 2:22 PM To: Oracle Discussion List Subject: Patchset 10.1.0.4 Few days after the patchset was released there is still not a single=20 1-off patch in the Metalink. Does that mean that 10.1.0.4 is bug free (a.k.a "unbreakable") or that=20 Oracle Support personnel is intensely concentrated on the Schiavo case and pope's health? --=20 Mladen Gogala Oracle DBA Ext. 121 -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l