Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: About standby redo logs

RE: About standby redo logs

From: Yerong He <yhe_at_challenger.com.au>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:46:07 +1100
Message-ID: <E83AA044C534174688F8DDF5A5FC7A1390B023@cssyda021.au.challenger.net>


Metalink note 219344.1 mentions there is a bug 2722195 "JUST TWO OF AVAILABLE STANDBY REDO LOGS ARE EVER USED IN A DATAGUARD ENVIRONMENT"
It has the status "Closed, Not a Bug" . :-)

-----Original Message-----
From: Carel-Jan Engel [mailto:cjpengel.dbalert_at_xs4all.nl] Sent: 6 January 2005 3:55
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: About standby redo logs

Kamus,
Oracle documents that one needs at least the # of redo log groups on the primary + 1 on the standby, when standby redologs are used. I never saw a logswitch happen to another standby redologfile than the one previously used, so your observation is quite normal, though somewhat unexpected regarding the documented requirements. DG always seems to reuse the same logfile. I guess it has to do with the speed of the ARCH on the standby. I need to investigate this further if I get a chance on a testsystem, before I can get more conclusive on this.

Because normally DG-configurations have real HA requirements (if not, why was DG implemented), I tend to stay on the safe side and follow the Oracle docs. It's a little bit CYA, I admit, so be it.

Best regards,

Carel-Jan Engel

===
If you think education is expensive, try ignorance. (Derek Bok) ===

Upcoming appearances:

On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 15:33, Kamus wrote:

> I create 4 standby redo log groups, and use LGWR in primary site to
> transfer redo data, all are good. But when I query the V$STANDBY_LOG
> view, I found that only the status column of GROUP# 4(the first group
> of my standby redo logs) value is "ACTIVE" while all the others(5-7)
> are "UNASSIGNED".
> also, only GROUP# 4's sequence# is a value greate than 0
> and THREAD# is 1, all others are 0 and 0.
>
> Any explains.

            
      * 


--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l



This email and any files transmitted with it are intended for the named recipient only. The information contained in this message may be confidential, legally privileged or commercially sensitive. If you are not the intended recipient you must not reproduce or distribute any part of the email, disclose its contents to any other party, or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this email in error, please contact the sender immediately by return email and delete this message from your computer.

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Thu Jan 06 2005 - 18:41:53 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US