From oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Tue Dec 7 08:29:31 2004 Return-Path: Received: from air189.startdedicated.com (root@localhost) by orafaq.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iB7ETVD26813 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 08:29:31 -0600 X-ClientAddr: 206.53.239.180 Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180]) by air189.startdedicated.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iB7ETUm26808 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 08:29:30 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 2383A72C7E9; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 09:35:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07953-85; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 09:35:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 1CA1E72D07F; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 09:33:22 -0500 (EST) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: RE: DISM & Oracle 9i Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 09:30:02 -0500 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: DISM & Oracle 9i Thread-Index: AcTcAUWQ3ymB+TLBS7K98wdreTiPSgAZCDqQAADjxfA= From: "Bobak, Mark" To: "Bobak, Mark" , , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Dec 2004 14:30:03.0289 (UTC) FILETIME=[3D648090:01C4DC69] X-archive-position: 13228 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: Mark.Bobak@il.proquest.com Precedence: normal Reply-To: Mark.Bobak@il.proquest.com X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at freelists.org Here's the URL to the SunSolve article, which was originally provided to me by Sten Rognes. http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=3D1-9-72952-1 -Mark I previously said:=20 > Scott, >=20 > I ran into a LARGE brick wall, when trying to set sga_max_size, > (which implicitly enables DISM), but I was on Solaris 8. Don't > even think about it on Solaris 8. On solaris 9, if you're on a=20 > suitably recent version (I *think* it's April 2004 or later), > then you should be fine. Solaris 8 and early versions of=20 > Solaris 9 are *bad news*, but recent Solaris 9 is ok. -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l