From oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org  Tue Sep 14 15:02:45 2004
Return-Path: <oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org>
Received: from air189.startdedicated.com (root@localhost)
 by orafaq.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i8EK2jW10317
 for <oracle-l@orafaq.com>; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 15:02:45 -0500
X-ClientAddr: 206.53.239.180
Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180])
 by air189.startdedicated.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i8EK2jI10312
 for <oracle-l@orafaq.com>; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 15:02:45 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP
 id 9C04572D1D5; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 15:08:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id 20140-31; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 15:08:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP
 id EAE6272C7C8; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 15:08:38 -0500 (EST)
From: ryan_gaffuri@comcast.net
To: oracle-l@freelists.org
Subject: performance issues with public synonyms?
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 20:07:07 +0000
Message-Id: <091420042007.20841.41474F6B00022D68000051692200750744079D9A00000E09A1020E979D@comcast.net>
X-Authenticated-Sender: cnlhbl9nYWZmdXJpQGNvbWNhc3QubmV0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-archive-position: 9478
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
X-original-sender: ryan_gaffuri@comcast.net
Precedence: normal
Reply-To: ryan_gaffuri@comcast.net
X-list: oracle-l
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at freelists.org

anyone ever notice any severe problems? I tested this to some degree with parallel connections. I didn't notice much of a difference with and without synonyms. 
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

