From oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Thu Sep 9 18:28:33 2004 Return-Path: Received: from air189.startdedicated.com (root@localhost) by orafaq.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i89NSXV17913 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 18:28:33 -0500 X-ClientAddr: 206.53.239.180 Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180]) by air189.startdedicated.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i89NSXI17908 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 18:28:33 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 80F2372D675; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 18:29:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17875-92; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 18:29:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id E91F072C7E5; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 18:29:51 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Licensing for test and development servers? From: Carel-Jan Engel To: OracleDude@gmail.com Cc: oracle-l@freelists.org In-Reply-To: References: <564DE4477544D411AD2C00508BDF0B6A2133DED8@usahm018.exmi01.exch.eds.com> Content-type: text/plain Organization: DBA!ert Message-Id: <1094773236.27727.27.camel@dbalert199.dbalert.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 01:40:36 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 9350 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: cjpengel.dbalert@xs4all.nl Precedence: normal Reply-To: cjpengel.dbalert@xs4all.nl X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at freelists.org I've seen a lot of shops being fully licensed (i.e. producttion, development and testservers). One shop just recently renewed their licensed and part of the deal was that devlopment/test goes for free now. AFAIK all databases should be licensed, except for the test and study purposes at your home system. However, lots of execptions arise when Purchase and Sales people are putting deals together. If you want the offical Oracle guidelines, download and read the Software Investment Guide (SIG) from oracle. Best regards, Carel-Jan Engel === If you think education is expensive, try ignorance. (Derek Bok) === On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 22:36, Jamie Kinney wrote: > We have production licenses. My question is around licenses for the > servers which are only used for development, test, QA, etc... Do you > have separate licenses for these servers? > > -Jamie > > > On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 16:04:40 -0400, Powell, Mark D wrote: > > This is not legal advice (see someone with a valid law practice for that) > > but it would appear that as long as you are working on a single copy of a > > program that you are not using for either your own internal use and that is > > not running at any other sites then you are developing and do not need to > > purchase a license. I would think program here could be plural as in you > > are developing an application that might consist of a dozen programs. > > > > But as soon as you use the programs to conduct training you must buy a > > license or if you start using the application either in-house or somewhere > > else you must buy licenses. Conducting training in advance of implementing > > the application either internally or externally would probably be a trigger > > point for requiring a license. > > > > This is the best I can figure it. We run production so we have licenses > > that I believe cover us, but it never hurts to try to keep up with this > > stuff. When in doubt dump the problem on management. If you are management > > then pass it by legal. Better safe than sorry. > > > > IMHO -- Mark D Powell -- -- To unsubscribe - mailto:oracle-l-request@freelists.org&subject=unsubscribe To search the archives - http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/