From oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org  Fri Aug 27 15:34:08 2004
Return-Path: <oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org>
Received: from air189.startdedicated.com (root@localhost)
 by orafaq.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i7RKY8F18336
 for <oracle-l@orafaq.com>; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:34:08 -0500
X-ClientAddr: 206.53.239.180
Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180])
 by air189.startdedicated.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i7RKY8I18330
 for <oracle-l@orafaq.com>; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:34:08 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP
 id 8AFEE72E309; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:31:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id 07522-53; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:31:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP
 id 4B56972D5B4; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:03:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:00:51 -0500 (EST)
X-Original-To: oracle-l@freelists.org
Delivered-To: oracle-l@freelists.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 31A2C72EAC5
 for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 14:56:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id 29036-37 for <oracle-l@freelists.org>;
 Fri, 27 Aug 2004 14:56:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from cc0eb005.schwab.com (cc0eb005.schwab.com [162.93.253.117])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 1B82672D290
 for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 14:12:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from s0743cdc.schwab.com (s0743cdc.schwab.com [162.93.239.70])
 by cc0eb005.schwab.com (Switch-3.1.2/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id i7RJFES3004531
 for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:15:14 -0400
Received: (from root@localhost) by sendmail.cf s0743cdc  id i7RJFETT012476 for oracle-l@freelists.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:15:14 -0400
Received: ( Schwab Email )
 by copymail.cf s0743cdc  with SMTP id i7RJFD5e012447;
 for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:15:13 -0400
Received: From n1121smx.nt.schwab.com ([10.0.50.65]) by n1110smx.nt.schwab.com (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a P0803.345);
 id 109363411044; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:15:10 -0700
Received: by n1121smx.nt.schwab.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
 id <RM4Z9DDF>; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:15:02 -0700
Message-ID: <4BD75994A2DEC542AD401194FE45E62E027D73FA@n1021smx.nt.schwab.com>
From: "Rognes, Sten" <Sten.Rognes@schwab.com>
To: "'oracle-l@freelists.org'" <oracle-l@freelists.org>
Subject: RE: Re: Is anyone using Cluster file system using OCFS for  Linux
	 for Oracle Cluster Registry and CRS voting disk?
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:14:55 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-type: text/plain
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at freelists.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-archive-position: 8478
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
X-original-sender: Sten.Rognes@schwab.com
Precedence: normal
Reply-To: oracle-l@freelists.org
X-list: oracle-l
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at freelists.org



>> 1) The prohibition of using OCFS for the oracle binary tree as of the
>> apparently latest installation documentation causes me to be skeptical of
>> OCFS in general.

I believe that the reason for not locating "regular files" such as you
$ORACLE_BASE and $ORACLE_HOME trees on OCFS stems from the fact that when
the database opens a file on OCFS it uses the o_direct flag. When a file is
opened with o_direct regular file access is not permitted. You might want to
take a look at patches 2883583 and 2913284. These contain o_direct enabled
file utilities like dd, cp, tar etc. 

If you're not doing a production implementation, you might want to take a
look at the OCFS2 Beta4, it's available from
http://oss.oracle.com/projects/ocfs2/
The new version offers a lot more flexibility management wise than the
previous version.

You might also want to take a look at Polyserve as an alternative to OCFS.
I've been quite impressed with their CFS.


Sten


----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@freelists.org
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

