From oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org  Fri Aug  6 09:26:53 2004
Return-Path: <oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org>
Received: from air189.startdedicated.com (root@localhost)
 by orafaq.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i76EQqb05690
 for <oracle-l@orafaq.com>; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 09:26:52 -0500
X-ClientAddr: 206.53.239.180
Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180])
 by air189.startdedicated.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i76EQqI05685
 for <oracle-l@orafaq.com>; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 09:26:52 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP
 id D5E3A72C11E; Fri,  6 Aug 2004 09:17:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id 20134-24; Fri,  6 Aug 2004 09:17:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP
 id 01AF872CA2C; Fri,  6 Aug 2004 09:17:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Fri, 06 Aug 2004 09:16:04 -0500 (EST)
X-Original-To: oracle-l@freelists.org
Delivered-To: oracle-l@freelists.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 9909872CF8E
 for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Fri,  6 Aug 2004 09:15:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id 19174-79 for <oracle-l@freelists.org>;
 Fri,  6 Aug 2004 09:15:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail.alise.lv (dao-apollo.alise.lv [195.13.251.94])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 8A90972CAB4
 for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Fri,  6 Aug 2004 09:15:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mail.alise.lv (Postfix, from userid 333)
 id CF6BE9D996; Fri,  6 Aug 2004 17:30:25 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from ross.alise.lv (unknown [172.16.0.14])
 by mail.alise.lv (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29EFC9D8E1
 for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Fri,  6 Aug 2004 17:30:25 +0300 (EEST)
In-Reply-To: <OF6EA248DC.227640E8-ONC2256EE8.004D20DB-C2256EE8.004E7A50@alise.lv>
To: oracle-l@freelists.org
Subject: Re: Time to read 6000 (block size 2k) blocks
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.2 June 01, 2004
Message-ID: <OFC6BE2406.2C4B2BF8-ONC2256EE8.004E71D2-C2256EE8.004FB020@alise.lv>
From: J.Velikanovs@alise.lv
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 17:22:07 +0300
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ROSS/IT ALISE/LV(Release 5.0.11  |July 24, 2002) at
 2004.08.06 17:22:08,
 Serialize complete at 2004.08.06 17:22:08
Content-type: text/plain
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at freelists.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-archive-position: 7063
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
X-original-sender: J.Velikanovs@alise.lv
Precedence: normal
Reply-To: oracle-l@freelists.org
X-list: oracle-l
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at freelists.org

UUUUUps!!!
!(21.86/6126)*1000 = 45,7ms/pio.!
Forget that I have told you. It is complicit rubbish.
I don’t know how I got 45,7.

The correct is 3,56 ms.
And it is looks definitely better then 45 ms.
Do not rush to sysadm ;) You need to look on the different optimization 
area.

Please excuse my fault.
It is seems late Friday syndrome


Jurijs
+371 9268222 (+2 GMT)
============================================
Thank you for teaching me.
http://otn.oracle.com/ocm/jvelikanovs.html






J.Velikanovs@alise.lv
Sent by: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
06.08.2004 17:08
Please respond to oracle-l
 
        To:     oracle-l@freelists.org
        cc: 
        Subject:        Re: Time to read 6000 (block size 2k) blocks


(21.86/6126)*1000 = 45,7ms/pio.
By my experience everything what is below 20ms in general is OK.
High end need to be quicker ~10ms.
We have HP EVA solution implemented. 
The response time is 5 ms, even in high load situations (There 12 CPU, RAC 

configuration).
.
In your case 45 ms can be the problem.
I would discuss this with system administrators or supplier 
representatives.
.
PS Do not forget about throughput of channels 180Mbit/s, 320Mbit/s, 
1Gbit/s. Check sum of IO stream volumes.

Jurijs
+371 9268222 (+2 GMT)
============================================
Thank you for teaching me.
http://otn.oracle.com/ocm/jvelikanovs.html






jaysingh1@optonline.net
Sent by: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
06.08.2004 16:48
Please respond to oracle-l
 
        To:     oracle-l@freelists.org
        cc: 
        Subject:        Time to read 6000 (block size 2k) blocks


Hi All,

The question may be wispy.
We have 14 CPU sun box,8i 2 node OPS. Not under heavy load.

In our case it is taking 21.86 sec for 6126 blocks (from disk)

db file sequential read                      6126        0.29 21.86

Approximately how long it should take to read 6000 blocks?


call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current  rows
------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- 
----------
Parse        1      0.01       0.01          0          0          0     0
Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0     0
Fetch        2     11.39      41.98       6126      18805          0     1
------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- 
----------
total        4     11.40      41.99       6126      18805          0     1



db file sequential read                      6126        0.29 21.86

Thanks
Sami


----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@freelists.org
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------



----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@freelists.org
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------


----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@freelists.org
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

