Stephen,
Very well said.
I might add that there are three classifications on reality
1) how you want it to work
2) how the masses believe it to work
3) how it really works
Regards,
Daniel Fink
Stephen.Lee_at_DTAG.Com wrote:
>>-----Original Message-----
>>I think Dan Tow pointed out a potential upside ...
>>I think Wolfgang Breitling pointed out that ...
>>I think I agree with both of them, but ...
>
>
> I don't want to run this into the ground so (maybe?) one more post from me.
>
> I think what is going on here is a collision of theory and practice. It
> appears to me that the ivy covered halls of academia (certainly nothing
> judgmental in that tag is there??) want to treat the subquery as nothing
> more than a set to be intersected, unioned, whatever. While the
> practitioners want it to be a virtual, pre-built, stand-alone table because
> ... really ... honestly ... that's the way we mere mortals use them. The
> academicians want to keep the theoretical model pure and holy. The
> practitioners just want the stupid thing to work.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
> put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
> --
> Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
> FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
http://www.orafaq.com
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Fri Jul 16 2004 - 14:41:22 CDT
