From oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org  Wed Jul 14 13:26:14 2004
Return-Path: <oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org>
Received: from air189.startdedicated.com (root@localhost)
 by orafaq.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i6EIPn628787
 for <oracle-l@orafaq.com>; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:25:59 -0500
X-ClientAddr: 206.53.239.180
Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180])
 by air189.startdedicated.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i6EIPS628700
 for <oracle-l@orafaq.com>; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:25:48 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP
 id D120672D912; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:05:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id 01019-95; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:05:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP
 id 4F2ED72D4E7; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:04:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:02:34 -0500 (EST)
X-Original-To: oracle-l@freelists.org
Delivered-To: oracle-l@freelists.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 782EE72D096
 for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:02:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id 31943-93 for <oracle-l@freelists.org>;
 Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:02:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from jands2.bayer.com (host250.bayer.com [192.122.250.250])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 2AFD972D933
 for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:01:32 -0500 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <KNEIIDHFLNJDHOOCFCDKMEJPFAAA.mwf@rsiz.com>
To: oracle-l@freelists.org
Subject: RE: Oracle on SAN recommendation...
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Michael Boligan <michael.boligan.b@bayer.com>
Message-ID: <OF0A77F657.4F5E7372-ON85256ED1.0064813C-85256ED1.00654BB3@bayer.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 14:26:25 -0400
Content-type: text/plain
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at freelists.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-archive-position: 5105
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
X-original-sender: michael.boligan.b@bayer.com
Precedence: normal
Reply-To: oracle-l@freelists.org
X-list: oracle-l
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at freelists.org

Number of disks is not the only bottleneck.  If they are all going through 
the same controller you will still have a problem. 
Assuming you have multiple controllers you may want to address the next 
issue, availability.  What is the configuration of the disk under /oradata 
(RAID 0,1,5...)?  This is just as important.
If you are lucky, Tim Gorman or Mathew Zito will reply to this post and 
tell you everything you ever needed to know about disk storage.

HTH,
Mike



"Mark W. Farnham" <mwf@rsiz.com> 
Sent by: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
07/14/2004 02:11 PM
Please respond to
oracle-l@freelists.org


To
<oracle-l@freelists.org>
cc

Subject
RE: Oracle on SAN recommendation...






Baarf.

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org]On Behalf Of Jose Luis Delgado
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 1:54 PM
To: oracle-l@freelists.org
Subject: Oracle on SAN recommendation...


List!

I would like to receive a bit of help on this:
(SunOS 5.8, Oracle 8.1.7)

We have a SAN solution from EMC, they created several
filesystems, one of them is named: /oradata

That filesystem, was left for Oracle data only.

Five databases were created for an external dba, ALL
the datafiles, controlfiles and redolog files were
placed in the same structure, i.e:
/oradata/<SID>/datafiles and controlfiles and
redologfiles (not yet in archive log mode).

EMC argue that, since the filesystem was created from
several separate physical disks, they form a 'LOGICAL'
disk, and there shouldn't be a problem with contention
(due to implicit distribution of data) or something
else.

Is that ok?

Please, can you elaborate on this?

Thanks in advance!
JL



 
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail 
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@freelists.org
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------


----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@freelists.org
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------



----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@freelists.org
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

