From oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org  Wed May  5 09:12:20 2004
Return-Path: <oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org>
Received: from air189.startdedicated.com (root@localhost)
 by orafaq.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i45EC5e15561
 for <oracle-l@orafaq.com>; Wed, 5 May 2004 09:12:15 -0500
X-ClientAddr: 206.53.239.180
Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180])
 by air189.startdedicated.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i45EBs615514
 for <oracle-l@orafaq.com>; Wed, 5 May 2004 09:12:04 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP
 id C14E972D06D; Wed,  5 May 2004 09:02:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id 31669-44; Wed,  5 May 2004 09:02:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP
 id 2241572D071; Wed,  5 May 2004 09:02:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Wed, 05 May 2004 09:01:29 -0500 (EST)
X-Original-To: oracle-l@freelists.org
Delivered-To: oracle-l@freelists.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 863A372D039
 for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Wed,  5 May 2004 09:01:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id 30969-58 for <oracle-l@freelists.org>;
 Wed,  5 May 2004 09:01:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail.acelerate.com (mail.acelerate.com [200.105.128.132])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with SMTP id CB5D072D027
 for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Wed,  5 May 2004 09:01:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: (qmail 5073 invoked from network); 5 May 2004 14:15:12 -0000
Received: from dazasoftware.com (HELO org48l7d9ara8b) (200.105.151.94)
  by 0 with SMTP; 5 May 2004 14:15:12 -0000
Message-ID: <006801c432aa$d1bdea10$2501a8c0@dazasoftware.com>
From: "Juan Cachito Reyes Pacheco" <jreyes@dazasoftware.com>
To: <oracle-l@freelists.org>
Subject: CONTAINS,CATSEARCH, andMATCHES are more effective than plsql equivalent?
Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 10:11:00 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at freelists.org
X-archive-position: 4434
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
X-original-sender: jreyes@dazasoftware.com
Precedence: normal
Reply-To: oracle-l@freelists.org
X-list: oracle-l
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at freelists.org

Hi

If you have installed Oracle text you can use other functions like
CONTAINS,CATSEARCH, andMATCHES

My question is if someone knows about some performance test that shows
Oracle text functions as better than plsql equivalent functions.

Thanks

Juan Carlos Reyes Pacheco
OCP
Database 9.2 Standard Edition


----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@freelists.org
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

