From oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Tue Mar 30 12:50:02 2004 Return-Path: Received: from air189.startdedicated.com (root@localhost) by orafaq.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i2UIo0L19058 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 12:50:00 -0600 X-ClientAddr: 206.53.239.180 Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180]) by air189.startdedicated.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i2UInxo19053 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 12:50:00 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 9FD9B6354E0; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 13:43:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01953-29; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 13:43:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 3AB19635481; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 13:43:15 -0500 (EST) Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Tue, 30 Mar 2004 13:42:04 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: oracle-l@freelists.org Delivered-To: oracle-l@freelists.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 9275D634A88 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 13:41:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01363-37 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 13:41:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from qescan1.qgraph.com (QESCAN2.qgraph.com [206.158.124.8]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id C73066353AA for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 13:41:55 -0500 (EST) Received: by sxsmtp1.qgraph.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 12:48:00 -0600 Message-ID: From: "Jesse, Rich" To: "'oracle-l@freelists.org'" Subject: RE: Please advice sql server vs. Oracle Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 12:48:07 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at freelists.org X-archive-position: 2096 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: Rich.Jesse@quadtechworld.com Precedence: normal Reply-To: oracle-l@freelists.org X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at freelists.org I was wondering why they would site TPC numbers from 1997. Informix all the way! Rich (<%50 quote this time) Rich Jesse System/Database Administrator rich.jesse@quadtechworld.com QuadTech, Sussex, WI USA > From: Mladen Gogala [mailto:mladen@wangtrading.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 11:35 AM > > I was more confused by the TPC chart, from which DB2 was > conspicuously > absent. SQL Server was grouped around the bottom, while oracle and > informix were on top. Oracle has more deficiencies then solely the ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------