| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
 |
 | |||
| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
|
| |||
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: 9i - ASSM
Nope that's ASM, not ASSM. Automatic Storage Management is 10g, ASSM prior to that, two different things with similar acronyms. That's why I like "ASS management" so much. :)
Pete
"Controlling developers is like herding cats."
Kevin Loney, Oracle DBA Handbook
"Oh no, it's not. It's much harder than that!"
Bruce Pihlamae, long-term Oracle DBA
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Tony Johnson
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 9:15 AM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: RE: 9i - ASSM
Isnt ASSM a 10g function only ? The discussion may be mute ...
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]On Behalf Of Mark Moynahan
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 2:49 PM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: 9i - ASSM
We are having a debate on building tablespaces with automatic segment space management (ASSM). This is a 9i db on a Solaris box. I'm in favor of using ASSM but the senior dba is a bit hesitant and want to put in manual mode. I've even tried to persuade him with the Oracle documentation but he insists its not mature enough for production.
Is there any white papers or matalink papers that show the pros and cons to ASSM in 9i? Has anyone had issues with using ASSM? Is there a way of proving ASSM is better than MSSM?
Thanks,
Mark
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.htmlput 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
 |
 |