Return-Path: Received: from air189.startdedicated.com (root@localhost) by orafaq.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i12EX4B14591 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 08:33:04 -0600 X-ClientAddr: 206.53.239.180 Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180]) by air189.startdedicated.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i12EX3o14542 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 08:33:03 -0600 Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id A5A9F394C62; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 09:29:58 -0500 (EST) Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Mon, 02 Feb 2004 09:29:02 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: oracle-l@freelists.org Delivered-To: oracle-l@freelists.org Received: from mail2.summitworks.com (unknown [65.202.208.195]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 5ED1B39495E for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 09:28:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from senkumar [61.11.73.102] by mail2.summitworks.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.01) id AF8E4D10126; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 09:32:46 -0500 From: "Senthil Kumar" To: Subject: Migrate 11.5.8 Linux to NT Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 20:14:51 +0530 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-archive-position: 537 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: senthilkumard@summitworks.com Precedence: normal Reply-To: oracle-l@freelists.org X-list: oracle-l Hi List, We have a plan to migrate our APPS 11.5.8 Linux server to NT. Is it possible to do so... Any doc's no this??? TIA Senthil. -----Original Message----- From: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org]On Behalf Of Luc.Demanche@astrazeneca.com Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 7:49 PM To: oracledba@lazydba.com; oracle-l@freelists.org Subject: Capacity Planner from OEM VS Statspack Hi DBA, I'm starting to take a look at the "Capacity Planner" tool from the Diagnostics Pack. Great tool, collects info on lots of interesting statistics ... from databases - Response time - Wait events - I/O - Storage - ... and servers - CPU - Memory - File system - ... Good Report tool, create graphics and you can even do a trend analysis... I have two questions: 1- Are a lot of you using it? 2- Does STATSPACK become less usefull? I would keep STATSPACK for the SQL level. Capacity Planner doesn't seem to handler that level. Right? Thanks Luc --------- Luc Demanche AstraZeneca R&D Montreal Oracle Database Administrator 514.832.3200 x2356 ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html ----------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------