Re: RE: pga_aggregate_target and a memory leak

On 01/23/2004 07:54:25 PM, "Arnold, Sandra" wrote:
> We still have an 8.1.5 database as well as two 8.1.7.4 and one 9.2.04
> databases. We are planning on upgrading our 8i databases this year.
> The
> rate we are going it probably will be two years before we get to 10g.
>
> Sandra

That would be a very courageous thing to do. I'm not sure that 10g will be stable enough for a big production database in 2 years. Experience with 9i tells us that nothing before 9.2.0.4 was not fit for a real production use. If I remember correctly, 9i is out for more then 2 years now. Have in mind that 10g is the first version that was written almost entirely outside of the US. I wouldn't rush into upgrading to 10g, if I were you. And the rumor is that 10g is so unstable that even with the standards lowered so much, Oracle doesn't want to release like that.

-- 
Mladen Gogala
Oracle DBA
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Mladen Gogala
  INET: mgogala_at_adelphia.net

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).