[oracle-l] Re: list configuration

I could care less. *-)

Dick Goulet
Senior Oracle DBA
Oracle Certified 8i DBA

-----Original Message-----
From: babette.turnerunderwood_at_hrdc-drhc.gc.ca
[mailto:babette.turnerunderwood_at_hrdc-drhc.gc.ca]
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 1:46 PM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: [oracle-l] Re: list configuration

I agree with Jack
I filter on the "to" field and Outlook catches it fine.

Babette Turner-Underwood
w

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org =3D
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of =3D
JApplewhite_at_austin.isd.tenet.edu
Sent: 2004-01-23 10:37 AM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: [oracle-l] Re: list configuration

I vote to take it off. I have my Lotus Notes filter on the To = field,=3D20
checking for Oracle-L and dumping those emails in my Oracle-L box. =3D Works=3D20
fine for our new Freelists home.

Jack C. Applewhite - Database Administrator Austin (Texas) Independent School District 512.414.9715 (wk)
512.935.5929 (pager, 5129355929_at_page.metrocall.com) JApplewhite_at_austin.isd.tenet.edu

Jared Still <jkstill_at_cybcon.com>
Sent by: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
01/23/2004 09:05 AM
Please respond to oracle-l

=3D20

        To:     oracle-l_at_freelists.org
        cc:=3D20
        Subject:        [oracle-l] list configuration

I've been asked if I can remove the [oracle-l] from the subject header.

1. probably. Just don't have time to do it for a day or so.

Any other issues, let me know.

Jared Received on Fri Jan 23 2004 - 12:48:04 CST