Re: DB_WRITER_PROCESSES vs DBWR_IO_SLAVES

From: Nuno Souto <nsouto_at_optusnet.com.au>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 00:29:27 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.005DC4E1.20040110002927@fatcity.com>

Since when is redo log writing
performance handled by DB_WRITERS
or DBWR_IO_SLAVES?

Cheers
Nuno Souto
nsouto_at_optusnet.com.au
----- Original Message -----

Now, the Sr DBA here is screaming about the performance since I made the change,
in particular, he says he's seeing high redo latch contention and redo log
buffer waits which he says validates his contention that we need to get back to
using DBWR_IO_SLAVES.

--

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--

Author: Nuno Souto
  INET: nsouto_at_optusnet.com.au

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Received on Sat Jan 10 2004 - 02:29:27 CST