Return-Path: <ml-errors@fatcity.com>
Received: from ensim.rackshack.net (root@localhost)
 by orafaq.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9SIZNK10636
 for <oracle-l@orafaq.net>; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 12:35:23 -0600
X-ClientAddr: 66.27.56.212
Received: from www3.fatcity.com (rrcs-west-66-27-56-212.biz.rr.com [66.27.56.212])
 by ensim.rackshack.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9SIZMc10629
 for <oracle-l@orafaq.net>; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 12:35:23 -0600
Received: (from root@localhost)
 by www3.fatcity.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h9SFKVm06656
 for oracle-l@orafaq.net; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 07:20:31 -0800
Received: by fatcity.com (05-Jun-2003/v1.0g-b73/bab) via fatcity.com id 005D4D05; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 07:19:24 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.005D4D05.20031028071924@fatcity.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 07:19:24 -0800
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <ORACLE-L@fatcity.com>
X-Comment: Oracle RDBMS Community Forum
X-Sender: "Jesse, Rich" <Rich.Jesse@qtiworld.com>
Sender: ml-errors@fatcity.com
Reply-To: ORACLE-L@fatcity.com
Errors-To: ML-ERRORS@fatcity.com
From: "Jesse, Rich" <Rich.Jesse@qtiworld.com>
Subject: RE: anyone have opinions on the future of the 'grid'?
Organization: Fat City Network Services, San Diego, California
X-ListServer: v1.0g, build 73; ListGuru (c) 1996-2003 Bruce A. Bergman
Precedence: bulk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I know, I know, it's a bit of a stretch, but I think the idea's the same --
subsets of work divided between multiple machines.  It's just that distcc is
implemented at a much higher level than what's probably considered "grid".
The benefit is that it's much easier to implement.  The downside is that
it's usefulness is much more limited.  But in this case, I think it works
well, at least according to my co-workers who use it.

Perhaps grid-wise Matt would care to comment?

Gridfullessnessly yours,
Rich


Rich Jesse                           System/Database Administrator
rjesse@qtiworld.com                  Quad/Tech Inc, Sussex, WI USA

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jared Still [mailto:jkstill@cybcon.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 6:39 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: RE: anyone have opinions on the future of the 'grid'?
> 
> 
> Rich,
> 
> That really isn't 'grid', but I think you know that.
> 
> GC essentially makes a network look like one great big
> box, with the cross platform functionality included.
> 
> In the immortal words of Scott McNeally:
> "The network is the computer".  :)
> 
> Don't know if he said if first.  John Brunner was likely
> the first to get the concept in print.
> 
> Jared
> 
> On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 10:09, Jesse, Rich wrote:
> > Some of us here at work have been using "grid computing" to compile
> > programs...
> > 
> > http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/distcc.xml
> > 
> > Standard disclaimers apply (e.g. all machines must have 
> same versions of
> > copmiler, same architecture, etc. to avoid problems).
> > 
> > 
> > Rich
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jesse, Rich
  INET: Rich.Jesse@qtiworld.com

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru@fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

