Return-Path: <ml-errors@fatcity.com>
Received: from ensim.rackshack.net (root@localhost)
 by orafaq.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9AI7aY21197
 for <oracle-l@orafaq.net>; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:07:36 -0500
X-ClientAddr: 66.27.56.210
Received: from ns3.fatcity.com (rrcs-west-66-27-56-210.biz.rr.com [66.27.56.210])
 by ensim.rackshack.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9AI7ac21191
 for <oracle-l@orafaq.net>; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:07:36 -0500
Received: from ns3.fatcity.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by ns3.fatcity.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h9AFNQUx012049
 for <oracle-l@orafaq.net>; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 08:24:01 -0700
Received: (from root@localhost)
 by ns3.fatcity.com (8.12.8/8.12.5/Submit) id h9AF0MYn003024
 for oracle-l@orafaq.net; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 08:00:23 -0700
Received: by fatcity.com (05-Jun-2003/v1.0g-b73/bab) via fatcity.com id 005D2B65; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 07:59:32 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.005D2B65.20031010075932@fatcity.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 07:59:32 -0800
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <ORACLE-L@fatcity.com>
X-Comment: Oracle RDBMS Community Forum
X-Sender: "M Rafiq" <rafiq9857@hotmail.com>
Sender: ml-errors@fatcity.com
Reply-To: ORACLE-L@fatcity.com
Errors-To: ML-ERRORS@fatcity.com
From: "M Rafiq" <rafiq9857@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Some bug in 9.2
Organization: Fat City Network Services, San Diego, California
X-ListServer: v1.0g, build 73; ListGuru (c) 1996-2003 Bruce A. Bergman
Precedence: bulk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Waleed,

If I remember correctly, I have seen this type of message in 7.3.4 database 
4 years back. If request for parallel query slave exceeds number of 
parallel_max_servers parameter.

Just check this aspect or reduce parallel degree in your code/hint or 
table/index degree.

Regards
Rafiq






Reply-To: ORACLE-L@fatcity.com
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <ORACLE-L@fatcity.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 18:19:25 -0800

This problem started really to be annoying. Suddenly some PQ processes die
and the system is never able to bring them back.
If some sql is submitted and was lucky enough to request a group of
processes that include one of this dead processes, it ends up running
without PQ at all.

We have RAC 9.2.0.2 on Solaris 2.8.

Here is the trace content:


	*** SESSION ID:(343.56680) 2003-10-09 21:14:17.807
kxfpg1srv
         could not start local P008




We get this trace in the udump, and nothing goes to bdump.

Did any of you experience this problem?

Thanks



Waleed

_________________________________________________________________
Instant message with integrated webcam using MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now 
FREE!  http://msnmessenger-download.com

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: M Rafiq
  INET: rafiq9857@hotmail.com

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru@fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

