Return-Path: <ml-errors@fatcity.com>
Received: from ensim.rackshack.net (root@localhost)
 by orafaq.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h7JBO8o03584
 for <oracle-l@orafaq.net>; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 06:24:08 -0500
X-ClientAddr: 66.27.56.213
Received: from www2.fatcity.com (rrcs-west-66-27-56-213.biz.rr.com [66.27.56.213])
 by ensim.rackshack.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h7JBO8p03579
 for <oracle-l@orafaq.net>; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 06:24:08 -0500
Received: (from root@localhost)
 by www2.fatcity.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h7J8umw30036
 for oracle-l@orafaq.net; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 01:56:48 -0700
Received: by fatcity.com (05-Jun-2003/v1.0g-b73/bab) via fatcity.com id 005CB6C5; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 01:49:30 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.005CB6C5.20030819014930@fatcity.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 01:49:30 -0800
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <ORACLE-L@fatcity.com>
X-Comment: Oracle RDBMS Community Forum
X-Sender: "Yechiel Adar" <adar76@inter.net.il>
Sender: ml-errors@fatcity.com
Reply-To: ORACLE-L@fatcity.com
Errors-To: ML-ERRORS@fatcity.com
From: "Yechiel Adar" <adar76@inter.net.il>
Subject: Re: 32 or 64?
Organization: Fat City Network Services, San Diego, California
X-ListServer: v1.0g, build 73; ListGuru (c) 1996-2003 Bruce A. Bergman
Precedence: bulk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

If you run the Enterprise Edition of Windows Server you can use more then
2GB for Oracle.
Check metalink:
Note:46001.1
Bulletin

Yechiel Adar
Mehish
----- Original Message -----
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <ORACLE-L@fatcity.com>
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 7:49 PM


>
>
> We are running oracle 9i on Windows 2000 Server. I recently started
> administering Oracle on Windows 2000 and noticed that when the oracle.exe
> process consumes 1450+ Mb of memory, we run into out of process memory
> error. We ended up recycling application servers every time this has
> happened and it really is a painful situation. I have been told that
> eventhough the machine has 2.5 Gb of RAM, Windows cannot address memory
> more than 2Gb and if you take out the memory needed for the OS, the
> effective memory addressable by process comes close to 1500Mb, which is
> what I have been noticing. First of all is this true?
>
>
> We are hoping to migrate to a 64 bit operating system like Windows 2003.
> Would it solve our problem? How stable is Windows 2003?
>
>
> Murali.
>
>
>
> --
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
> --
> Author:
>   INET: Murali_Pavuloori/Claritas@claritas.com
>
> Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
> San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> to: ListGuru@fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
> the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
> (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
> also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Yechiel Adar
  INET: adar76@inter.net.il

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru@fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

