Message-Id: <24756.322834@fatcity.com> From: "Rahul" Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 12:22:51 +0700 Subject: standby on SAN ? or use internal storage This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_004D_01C2F200.1695E800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable list, i'm a bit confused on whether to put the standby DB on the SAN = storage or=20 use the internal storage of the standby host !!!=20 config a two instances on primary server, data-files on SAN, hot standby db files = on SAN too. standby instances for both primary on another machine config b both primary on SAN, standby db files on the itnernal storage of standby = machine any thoughts ?=20 TIA Rahul ------=_NextPart_000_004D_01C2F200.1695E800 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
list, i'm a bit confused on whether to = put the=20 standby DB on the SAN storage or
use the internal storage of the standby = host !!!=20
 
config a
two instances on primary server, = data-files on SAN,=20 hot standby db files on SAN too.
standby instances for both primary on = another=20 machine
 
config b
both primary on SAN, standby db files = on the=20 itnernal storage of standby machine
 
any thoughts  ?
 
TIA
Rahul